Members Articles And Views
email us
your articles and we'll post them here on our new Members Articles Page.
We do reserve the right to edit and refuse
articles that are racist, contain profanity or remarks that may be abusive to
others.
The views of the authors on this page are not necessarily the views of
RednecksforAmericans.com
10-30-11 Nero In The White
House by: Mychal Massie
10-10-11
A Browning-Obama Parody
by: Anonymous
09-21-11 Da Can by
1Tea-edTexan
04-27-11 Cattle
Rustling, Gunfights... by 1Tea-edTexan
03-27-11 What Has America
Become? by Ken Huber
03-11-11 Annie Get Your Gun by 1Tea-edTexan
02-24-11 The Fix by
Unknown
01-29-11 Nullification
by Laurence Burke
12-17-10 The Day Before
Christmas by Jerry Evans
12-17-10 A Night at the
Opera by 1Tea-edTexan
12-08-10 The Fact Of The Matter
by 1Tea-edTexan
12-02-10 The Liberals
Christmas Gift by1Tea-edTexan
11-17-10 Veterans' Days
Remembered by 1Tea-edTexan
11-17-10 Texas
Declares War on the USA... Author Unknown
11-11-10 The Fallen Knights
by Kenneth Cook
10-22-10 Obamacare by
1Tea-edTexan
10-15-10
10-08-10 Snookered by 1 Tea-edTexan
10-01-10 If You
Ain't Mad, You Should Be! by 1 Tea-edTexan
9-24-10 The
Cimarron Strip - No Man's Land
9-19-10 Cracker Jack vs.
Obamacare by 1Tea-edTexan
9-10-10 Remember in November
by 1Tea-edTexan
8-27-10 Hiding Behind THE
Bush
7-23-10 I'm 63 And I'm Tired
by Robert A Hall
7-18-10 It's Our Fight Now
by Laurence Burke
7-09-10
Obama
lives outside the Constitution by Lynn
Vogel
6-24-10 Something to Reflect
On - The Reflecting Pool by 1Tea-edTexan
6-24-10
The Arizona
Experience by TJ Woodard
6-17-10
The Ass Kicking
Messiah Has Spoken
by 1Tea-edTexan
5-28-10
Pants on the Ground by 1Tea-edTexan
5-07-10 Oh My Gosh!
That's Exactly What's Happening to Our Country by 1Tea-edTexan
Nero In The White House
Is The American Way Of Life Over As We Know It?
"Three significant historical events have been eclipsed by Obama:
1)
Jimmy Carter will no longer be looked upon as the worst president in
American history;
2) Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton will no longer be
recognized as the greatest liars in presidential history;
3) Clinton's
stain on Monica's dress, and what that did to the White House in general
and the office of the president specifically,
will forever pale in
comparison to the stain and stench of Obama."
Read the rest of Mychal Massie's Commentary
here
This is well worth it and
deserves a proper title if you have any ideas
EMAIL US them
to us. I doubt if the author will
complain if we give this wonderful tribute to our Soldiers a name of our own.
And he sat around the Legion, Telling stories of the past.
Of a war that he once fought in And the deeds that he had
done,
In his exploits with his buddies; They were heroes, every
one.
And 'tho sometimes to his neighbors His tales became a
joke,
All his buddies listened quietly For they knew whereof he
spoke.
But we'll hear his tales no longer, For old Bob has passed
away,
And the world's a little poorer For a Soldier died today.
He won t be mourned by many, Just his children and his
wife.
For he lived an ordinary, Very quiet sort of life.
He held a job and raised a family, Going quietly on his
way;
And the world won't note his passing, 'Tho a Soldier died
today.
When politicians leave this earth, Their bodies lie in
state,
While thousands note their passing, And proclaim that they
were great.
Papers tell of their life stories From the time that they
were young
But the passing of a Soldier Goes unnoticed, and unsung.
Is the greatest contribution To the welfare of our land,
Someone who breaks his promise And cons his fellow man?
Or the ordinary fellow Who in times of war and strife,
Goes off to serve his country And offers up his life?
The politician's stipend And the style in which he lives,
Are often disproportionate, To the service that he gives.
While the ordinary Soldier, Who offered up his all,
Is paid off with a medal And perhaps a pension, small.
It is not the politicians With their compromise and ploys,
Who won for us the freedom That our country now enjoys.
Should you find yourself in danger, With your enemies at
hand,
Would you really want some cop-out, With his ever waffling
stand?
Or would you want a Soldier-- His home, his country, his
kin,
Just a common Soldier, Who would fight until the end?
He was just a common Soldier, And his ranks are growing
thin,
But his presence should remind us We may need his like
again.
For when countries are in conflict, We find the Soldier's
part
Is to clean up all the troubles That the politicians
start.
If we cannot do him honor While he's here to hear the
praise,
Then at least let's give him homage At the ending of his
days.
Perhaps just a simple headline In the paper that might
say:
"OUR COUNTRY IS IN MOURNING,
A SOLDIER DIED TODAY."
A Browning-Obama Parody
by Anonymous
How do I loathe thee, let me count the ways
I loathe thee to the depth, and breadth and height
My soul can reach when feeling my
loss of employment and economic calamity.
I loathe thee from the profound humiliation
Of applying for public welfare and loss of self-worth
To the bitter anguish of my trust betrayed
I loathe thee for the needless sacrifices and hardships
You have heaped upon my family,
my friends and my countrymen
I loathe thee for spawning social discord among all people
and stirring civil unrest
I loathe thee for providing aid and comfort to our enemies
While allowing our borders to remain violated
I loathe thee for squandering public treasure
and oppressing future generations with the bondage of debt
I loathe thee for usurping constitutional authority
And bringing shame to our most revered office
that you were chosen to occupy
And should you be reelected to that office
I will loathe thee even more.
Da Can
by 1Tea-edTexan
I never knew if the expression, "back in '02", referred
to 1902, 1802 or '02 B.C., but it was commonly used in my growing-up years. In
general, it meant that whatever event we were talking about happened a very long
time ago. It was mostly used (sometimes sarcastically) when we
couldn't remember the date, and the exact date was not all that important. It
just meant "way
back when".
Well, "back in '02", and that would be long before television became everyone's
baby-sitter, before children were addicted to video games, and before parents
were enslaved to the whims and wishes of their children, before the poliferation
of automobiles and three car garages, before cell phones, I-pads, emails and
instant messaging, before many dirt streets in my hometown were paved and
curbed, and that would be "way back when" most folks rode a city bus or walked
to their destination. Yeah....I go back that far.
The sandy roads that criss-crossed the piney woods region of East Texas were our
pathway to the familiar and our gateway to the unknown and adventure. Come
Summer, the sun-bleached roadbeds became rivers of superheated granules to
torment bare feet that dared to trespass on their firey surfaces. Come Fall and
throughout Winter, the earthy roadbeds would often transform into semi-solid
streams of muck and mire to challenge driving skills and the durability of odd
looking autos that would look at home in a Keystone Kops movie.
In time the earthen roadways began to disappear. The sound of heavy equipment
invaded our quite neighborhoods as roadgraders began preparing the roadbeds and
barrow pits (bar ditches).The air became heavy with the offensive smell of
petroleum as huge tankers arrived, spewing their black liquid cargo over the
freshly graded surfaces. The "age of the blacktop" had come. Travel would become
easier but the offensive smell of petroleum would never go away.
In today's theater of political drama, conflicting ideologies, career
politicians and competition for voters support, the expression, "kicking the can
down the road", has become a catch-all phrase
to hide political incompetence. It has been overworked by political leaders who
are unable or afraid to make decisions, to compromise or resolve important
issues. It has been exhausted by pundits, journalists and bloggers who recognize
the political ineptitude but refuse to address political bungling as failure.
The expression has become so stale that it his been stripped of the meaning of
the activity it is intended to describe. The remainder of this narrative is an
attempt to restore and clarify the truer meaning of the phrase, "kicking the can
down the road'.
Simply stated, "kicking the can down the road" is a metaphor for
procrastinating. It is used as a shield to describe the inability or failure to
act or resolve an issue, However, "kicking the can down the road" had it's
beginning in a real activity that gave rise to today's metaphor.
"Kicking the can down the road" is an activity of my generation. It is a
mindless, pointless noncompetitive activity without consequences or rewards. It
is nothing more than a childish attempt to escape boredom while traveling from
point "A" to point "B". It began "back in '02" when dirt roads across the
country were being transformed into blacktop thoroughfares. At the same time,
home canning of fruit and vegetables had began to fade in favor of store-bought
canned commodities and the use of metal containers for beverages began to
challenge their glass counterpart. In an era before serious enviornmental issues
were of great concerns, "tin cans", as they came to be called, were not always
properly disposed of and were found along most roadways.
Kids did a lot of walking "back in '02". They walked to school and to church;
they walked to town and to Friday night football games and to the old swimming
hole. That was all part of the unfolding American scene and no one thought of it
as a hardship. In the endless journeys around town, kids would walk along with
their companions or meet new ones along the way. Rarely did they walk alone.
I began" kicking the can down the road " at the age of six while walking with
other first graders to public school. "Kicking the can down the road" was not a
particularly fun thing to do. It was just something to do. There was no
competition involved; there were no rules to follow; there were no goals to
achieve and there were no points to be scored. It was a totally aimless, useless
activity and an absolute waste of energy whose only benefit was the temporary
relief of childish boredom from long walks on frequently traveled pathways. The
only object of "kicking the can down the road" (if any) was to keep the can in
play, but if the can was kicked into the bar ditch and out of play, it was of no
concern. There would always be another "can" to kick just down the road apiece.
The companions who walked along with us would join in the can kicking activity,
Sometimes they would find their own can along the way and there would be more
than one can in play. But it was OK to kick their can, it was even expected.
Whoever was closest to where the can came to rest was the next to kick the can,
so sooner or later, someone else would be kicking your can.
The can would be kicked in a general direction with no predetermined end in
mind. It made a tinny clanking noise as it advanced down the irregular surface
of the blacktop, bouncing from one side of the road to the other. Sometimes a
can would become so dented and worn till it was no longer suitable for our
activity. When it was no longer useful, it was summarily kicked into the nearest
bar ditch, never to be thought of again. Likewise, when "kicking the can down
the road" was no longer amusing, or when we simply tired of the activity or when
"kicking the can down the road" itself became boring, it was promptly kicked
into the nearest bar ditch and immediately forgotten.
Interestingly, once the affairs at our original destination were completed, it
was not at all unusual to find ourselves kicking the same can down the same road
but in an opposite direction.
Thus exposed as the mindless, pointless childish activity it represents, it is
easy to see how conveniently "kicking the can down the road" fits into today's
political dialog and how appropriately the phrase defines the inaction of our
elected representatives. It is, however, an evasion of the responsibility of
their elected office and an admission of their inability or unwillingness to
deal with the complex issues at hand.
Cattle
Rustling, Gun Fights, Public Hanging, Crooked Politicians and Cowboy Poetry
by 1Tea-edTexan
What does cattle rustling, gun fights, public hanging and
crooked politicians have in common with cowboy poetry? Of Course! They are all a
part of our culture, all part of our Western heritage. You can throw-in
bushwhacking, horse theft and claim jumping into the same mix. Just like Cowboy
Poetry, they are all a part of the great American scene. But is it the
responsibility of the taxpayer to fund a "cowboy poetry festival" in northern
Nevada. Harry Reid, (D. Nv) thinks so. He goes so far as to characterize
Republican efforts to reduce the budget by cutting funds to National Endowment
of the Humanities and National Endowment of the Arts, as "mean spirited". Reid
also argues that the cowboy poet roundup in his home state of Nevada will create
jobs. He fails to mention that those jobs, if any, will be temporary and of very
short duration.
Don't get me wrong here. Born and raised in Texas, I have a healthy appreciation
of our Western way of life. From the Silver Screen riders of yester year, like
Hoot Gibson, Tom Mix and Tim McCoy, through the age of Roy, Gene and Hoppy to
Eastwood and the" Duke", to the hard working ranchers of Arizona and the
butt-busting wranglers in Wyoming, the American cowboy and the Code of the West
are a large part of my core values. I acknowledge my bias to Western values and
I admit that I adopt them knowingly and voluntarily. At the same time, I
recognize that a longshoreman in New York or an architect in Atlanta may be
influenced by other factors and have somewhat different values and other
"worthwhile" projects to promote in their respective locations. So the question
comes to mind, should an auto-mechanic in Terre Haute or a registered nurse in
Portland be required to fund, through taxation, any event with so narrow an
interest and of so temporary benefit to so small a region. Harry Reid thinks so.
Reid is so convinced that federal funding for the "Cowboy Poetry Festival" in
Elko, Nevada, is so critical to his state that he is willing to hold up (and I
do mean holdup) legislation on the national budget. But, any temporary jobs will
be gone within a week and tourist will have moved on. How dumb is that?
Several years ago, while in Dallas, I learned that there was to be a "Cowboy
Poetry Reading" at a popular coffee house not too distant from where I was
staying. My affection for anything Western, led me to believe that it would be a
novel way to spend a Sunday afternoon. Shucking our street clothes in favor of
jeans and boots, my three companions and I arrived at the informal eatery early
to get the best seats and sample an amazing array of freshly ground and highly
overrated coffee.
We secured an up-front table, perfect for viewing the recitation that was to
come. The small "stage" was set-up, complete with lighting, microphone and an
overstuffed leather chair that, in retrospect, looked far to cushy for any
self-respecting cowboy. In the center of it all, stood a "tip jar" that was
obviously and unashamedly preloaded with five and ten dollar bill, alongside of
a not
all together inconspicuous sign saying "Donations Accepted" So,.. OK, I'm good
with that. Everybody has to make a living.
The performance began promptly at two o'clock with a brief introduction which
also stated that the performing cowboy poet would be reading from his own
compositions and the compositions of other poets. Our seven-bucks-a-cup coffee
was served just about the time the first reading began. Well...the coffee was
just OK. (hardly worth seven bucks) but I figured that helped to pay for the
entertainment. Between tips and whatever the proprietor agreed to pay , the poet
would make out pretty good (with no financial support from the government) for
two hours of "work" on a Sunday afternoon. Tip jar started to fill as the
performance continued.
The subjects, all things being Western, were excellent. The topics of sagebrush,
and prairie dogs, cattle drives and ponies, hardships and lost loves, were
blended in romantic stanzas of rhyme and
rhythm that evoked nostalgic imagery of frontier life and simpler times. Even
the reading was near perfection, with every vowel and every syllable spoken
perfectly and every period and comma rigidly observed. In fact, the readings
were far too perfect to be the utterance of a humble American cowboy. All the
hype and the Western regalia worn by the poet, the hat, the boots, the buckle
and the bolo tie, could not conceal the sophistication of the voice that spoke.
Closing my eyes and listening with no visual clues, the "cowboy poet" sounded
more like a professional actor or an undergraduate in English studies. Still I
listened attentively, but somehow feeling that cowboy poets ,at least in this
case, were pretty much of a sham. I rationalized those negative feelings away,
thinking that maybe this cowboy poet is, like me, not a cowboy in the literal
sense, but nonetheless a cowboy at heart.
Did I enjoy the performance? Immensely! Would I attend another performance?
Quite likely, if all things were favorable. Would I pay taxes for a festival in
Nevada or anywhere else? Not voluntarily! Do I think a dentist in Orlando, or
carpet layer in Detroit should pay taxes to fund a "cowboy poetry festival"
anywhere in the world? HELL NO. Let local or regional areas provide for their
local or regional activities. They are the ones that will benefit,
If Reid's arguments are valid, and taxpayers are required to fund the Cowboy
Poetry Festival, simply because it is part of our culture and will create
temporary jobs, then the same consideration must be given to the Maple Syrup
Festival in Wakarusa, Indiana and the Gilmer Yamboree Festival, in Gilmer,
Texas, celebrating the YAM. It naturally follows that equal consideration must
be given to the 300+ festivals in Indiana alone, plus countless other festivals,
in the remaining 49 states. There is an endless variety of state. and county
fairs, and festivals of every description. To name a few, there are: food fest,
jazz fest, wine festivals, beer festivals, country music festivals, mountain
music festivals, film fest, strawberry festivals. sugar mill festivals, and in
Marshall, Texas there is a fire-ant festival, in Mississippi there is a World
Catfish Festival, there is a juke-joint festival, and in Euphrates, Wa. there is
a Fresh Paint Festival while Anacortes, Wa. promotes a What The Heck Festival
and in Mississippi there is an Elvis Presley Festival. The examples are endless
with new events springing up every year. All are worthy projects that benefit
state tourism and local economies but none are worthy of federal funding. ARE WE
REALLY READY TO OPEN THE FEDERAL CHECKBOOK TO THIS VAST ARRAY OF LOCAL PROJECTS?
CAN WE AFFORD TO? I don't think so.
Please note: The following is a letter written to the editor
of Iosco County News Herald of Michigan on June 9, 2010.
Written nearly a year ago and we still face the same problems today. Is the
change here to stay?
Editor,
Has America become the land of special interest
and home of the double standard?
Lets see: if we lie to the Congress, it’s a felony and if the Congress lies to
us its just politics; if we dislike a black person, we’re racist and if a black
person dislikes whites, its their 1st Amendment right; the government spends
millions to rehabilitate criminals and they do almost nothing for the victims;
in public schools you can teach that homosexuality is OK, but you better not use
the word God in the process; you can kill an unborn child, but it is wrong to
execute a mass murderer; we don’t burn books in America, we now rewrite them; we
got rid of communist and socialist threats by renaming them progressive; we are
unable to close our border with Mexico, but have no problem protecting the 38th
parallel in Korea; if you protest against President Obama’s policies you’re a
terrorist, but if you burned an American flag or George Bush in effigy it was
your 1st Amendment right.
You can have pornography on TV or the internet, but you better not put a
nativity scene in a public park during Christmas; we have eliminated all
criminals in America, they are now called sick people; we can use a human fetus
for medical research, but it is wrong to use an animal.
We take money from those who work hard for it and give it to those who don’t
want to work; we all support the Constitution, but only when it supports our
political ideology; we still have freedom of speech, but only if we are being
politically correct; parenting has been replaced with Ritalin and video games;
the land of opportunity is now the land of hand outs; the similarity between
Hurricane Katrina and the gulf oil spill is that neither president did anything
to help.
And how do we handle a major crisis today? The government appoints a committee
to determine who’s at fault, then threatens them, passes a law, raises our
taxes; tells us the problem is solved so they can get back to their reelection
campaign.
What has happened to the land of the free and home of the brave?
- Ken Huber, Tawas City
"Annie Get Your Gun" was an Irving Berlin
Musical that opened in New York in May of 1946. Ethel Mermen starred in the
fictional role of Annie Oakley when Annie worked as a sharpshooter in the
Buffalo Bill Wild West Show. "Annie Get Your Gun" was the third longest running
musical of the 1940s and was performed on stage over a thousand times. The play
was adapted for the screen in 1950, and Betty Hutton played the role of the "crackshot"
but somewhat boorish Annie.
Today, when I say Annie get your gun, what I'm really saying is, 'Hey
Lady, you better git out there and find yourself a weapon to protect yourself
with and to defend your home with.' And do it NOW,
while you still can.
But you don't like guns. Right? And you detest violence. Correct? Well
understand this about guns, The only people that "love" guns are gun collectors.
Responsible gun owners regard their guns as tools that can be used to provide or
protect. All others are either criminal or whacko. Let's face it, women are the
most frequent victims of rape, assault and abuse and they should take all
possible measures to protect themselves.
Maybe you have a guy in your life that owns a gun or two and feel that he will
protect you. Unfortunately, It doesn't always work out like that. What if your
guy is at work, or maybe on a fishing trip or elsewhere? What then? Criminals
and abusers tend to watch their prey and to lay in wait for a moment of weakness
or an opportunity to attack. How many violent crimes are committed in a crowd?
Not too many, I suspect. Even if your guy is present there is always the
probability that he may be outnumbered, overpowered or outgunned. You just could
be the last line of defense for your guy as well as for yourself and any
youngsters that may be present. Scout's motto, "BE PREPARED"
There are plenty of reports and analyses on Violence and Crime Against Women
that you can view on the internet so I will not try to scare you or impress you
with the numbers, but the numbers speak for themselves. I will say that one
report states that over 600 rape and sexual assaults occur EVERY DAY.
Times being what they are, with so many unemployed and many resorting to crime,
things are likely to get worse, much worse. In Astabula County, in Ohio, one
county judge is advising (maybe warning) residents in his
county to arm themselves. Severe downturn in the economy has caused huge layoff
of peace officers. Their county jail can hold well over 100 prisoners but the
county can afford supervision for less than fifty. There are over 700 convicted
law breakers WAITING for "their turn" to serve their time. One
sheriff’s car now patrols the 700 square mile county jurisdiction. Wonder what
their response time is???
What should be of even greater concern is the polite remarks and the
"civil conversation" about Islam and the introduction of Shariah-law.
It is the worst possible thing that could happen to women and ALL
women should be livid with outrage. There is nothing civil about Sharia. Stoning
and amputation go way beyond cruel and unusual punishment, it is barbaric, and
women get the worst end of it. It IS NOT something that I would
want for my daughter or granddaughters. Every woman, every wife, every mother,
every daughter should badger, pester and nag, bother and annoy and worry
unceasingly every male in their life to MAN-UP and put an end
to any further discussion. Raise some holy hell with every
politician in your city, county, state and nation. BUT, Annie Get Your
Gun first! What has happened to the fever of women's suffrage and more
recently women's lib. Have we become so "civilized" that we will stand aside and
yield to barbaric rule. God help the women of America if the men of America fail
them.
by: 1Tea-edTexan
There recently was an article in the St. Petersburg
, Fl. Times. The Business Section asked readers for ideas on:
"How Would You Fix the Economy?" I think this guy nailed it!
Dear Mr. President,
Please find below my suggestion for fixing America 's economy. Instead of giving
billions of dollars to companies that will squander the money on lavish parties
and unearned bonuses, use the following plan.
You can call it the "Patriotic Retirement Plan":
There are about 40 million people over 50 in the work force. Pay them $1 million
apiece severance for early retirement with the following stipulations:
1) They MUST retire. Forty million job openings - Unemployment fixed.
2) They MUST buy a new AMERICAN Car. Forty million cars ordered - Auto Industry
fixed.
3) They MUST either buy a house or pay off their mortgage - Housing Crisis
fixed.
It can't get any easier than that!!
Author Unknown
P.S. If more money is needed, have all members in Congress pay their taxes..
Mr. President, while you're at it, make Congress retire on Social Security and
Medicare. I'll bet both programs would be fixed pronto!
GOP Invokes 1700's Doctrine In Health Care Fight -
Yahoo News Article
I am a big fan of "Nullification", so if you read the above article I would like
to weigh in that the article assumes certain things which are either incorrect,
or are lies.
While Nullification may be difficult for some to understand (especially those
who are educated in public schools) all one really needs to know to "get it" is
to remember why we have a constitution in the first place: The authors of our
Constitution, as representatives of the various states, had a great fear that a
centralized government would force its authoritarian will, by legislation, on
The People and States. And through that legislation The People and the States
would relent to tyrannical laws and that the federal government could eventually
do anything it wanted.... even in opposition to the will of the people.
The concept that federal employees, even in the form of a Supreme Court,
should have the final say in Constitutional matters would have been a ludicrous
proposition to those representatives who were meeting for the sole purpose of
preventing just that sort of situation. The Constitution would never have been
ratified if that was its intent. There would be no reason to ratify a document
dictating restrictions and authority over the federal government if that
federal body should have the final authority to say if they were working within
the confines of the document....obviously that situation would relegate the
whole document to
worthlessness. And I believe that is the
intent of many of those currently in power and in the federal
bureaucracy....just as the authors of our Constitution warned us.
Nullification is thought by many today to be a nonviable option. But this is
true only because We The People and the various States have lacked vigilance and
courage in our patriotic obligation to stand up to Big Fed. However. whether or
not people want to call it "Nullification", there have been instances recently
where individual states have passed laws which have in effect nullified
federal laws. Even left-leaning California has passed laws which assert that
state's right to sovereignty in the matter of making legal the medicinal use
marijuana in direct opposition to federal statutes. And many states have passed
legislation asserting our right to bear arms that contradicts federal edicts.
And recently many states have passed state laws in an attempt to nullify health
care legislation and against federal immigration regulations in those states By
not acting in these instances Big Fed has acknowledged that Nullification does
indeed have some teeth if The States and The People assert their right
and duty to stand up to unconstitutional legislation. Even if the appointed
federal employees on the nation's highest court divine the federal
regulations to be Constitutional.
It is our right and our duty as citizens to stand up to Big Fed and not obey
unconstitutional legislation and to remove those who would initiate such
regulations from power. If we allow the federal government to dictate over us
which laws are Constitutional, dictators is exactly what we will have.
by
Laurence Burke
The subdued light of early morning filtered through
the partially open blinds to announce the near arrival of daybreak. The coolness
of a winter night still lingered in the bedroom causing some
light chill. Sinking back into the softness of my pillow, I pulled the coverlet
over my left shoulder and felt the comforting warmth such covers afford. How
undeserving, I thought, that I should wake so early every Saturday morning,
while much of the planet remained asleep. My two weary eyes cried out to extend
their term of rest and I deliberately fought against consciousness with some
small hope of returning to my dream state. But sleep would not return.
My diminished state of awareness gave way to foolish thought as if to understand
or even justify this malevolent Saturday morning sleep disorder I knew, all too
well, that my lifetime custom of rising early had evolved into this dreaded
habit that gave me no relief. Still in that whimsical stage of morning stupor I
pondered, could this be some dark curse for some evil deed I committed in
another life now cast upon me by some unknown Voodoo princess? What utter
nonsense, I thought, as i sank lower in my pillow.
For a time I lay there, hunkered down lest I offend my ageing joints with
further movement. while trying to clear my mind of all foolish thoughts and
prepare my wit to deal with activities of the coming day. Amusingly, and with
much surprise, some old forgotten law of physics popped into my brain, seemingly
to rationalize my resolve to remain prone between the sheets. I was momentarily
entertained and smugly pleased with my own cleverness in making convenient use
of the principals which state , "a body at rest tends to remain at rest" to
validate my loss of morning vigor. Sounded ever so much better than the
underlying truth of the matter that advancing age was the root of it all. It
did.
Presently, certain areas of my body began to speak to me of pain, sending their
urgent messages with increasing frequency and intensity. Clearly my
bio-feedback, judging by the rising level of my discomfort, was finely tuned and
in perfect working order on this morning. This was nature's
diabolical way of warning me that those certain body parts, now done with their
rest did not choose to remain locked in their current position indefinitely. It
was their call to action.
I had no wish to make them suffer more so. with some reservation, I agreed with
myself, that I would get a move on, just as soon as I could make a move. Past
experience with old body parts proves that those parts which speak of pain when
they tire of resting, will scream in loud protest when they are put in motion.
On the other hand, certain other body parts which are most content to remain at
rest will protest even louder once disturbed. While I cowered in my warm and
sacred place of refuge, dreading to make that first move, I recalled another law
of physics which states that "a body set in motion, tends to remain in motion" ,
but it gave me little comfort. I knew what was to happen next and I cringed.
I choose not to repeat the expletives I muttered as I struggled to sit erect on
the bedside and I forbid so crude an utterance to be inscribed upon my
tombstone. I had successfully, so I thought, made the transition from my
increasingly uncomfortable prone position to a semi-upright sitting position
somewhat resembling a limp pair of pajamas and not altogether unlike my current
state of mind at that early hour. A short time later, I was able to visually
verify my own existence and I began to stretch and yawn and gasp for breath, all
in a single motion, while my feet searched blindly for my slippers somewhere on
the floor below. Gradually the pain subsided but it did not go away.
This morning ritual may seem morbidly strange to many, but it has become my
normal routine on Saturday morning as well as on all other days. In the
beginning, it was a matter of some concern, but in time I came to value this
exercise as a daily rite of passage in order to maintain my senior hood status
and I fear that should I fail to observe this propriety, even for a single day,
I will cease to exist. Of greater concern is the morning ritual of the dear lady
that sleeps beside me. Some amazing going-ons continue to occur on that side of
the bed, which I will not mention on pain of certain death.
With no particular sense of urgency on this first Saturday in December. I made
my way to the kitchen to complete my first, my most important and possibly the
only task that I would undertake on that day. The Brewing of the Coffee. Passing
through the living room, I picked-up the remote, and without bothering to look,
pressed the power button, then paced off the remaining steps to the kitchen.
Many things were happening in international affairs and national politics that
week and Congress was to vote on some important issues , so , my hastily
contrived plan was to watch the early news while savoring my precious brew. I
assembled "the fixings", placing the filter in the basket with a measured amount
of aroma roast grounds and filled the reservoir to it's proper level and waited
for the brew to make. The vaguely familiar melody of some Hungarian (or was it
Russian) rhapsody coming from the surround sound in the adjacent room took the
place of the annoying hype for some commercial product , then was followed by
the sound of a recognizable voice... it was the voice of that madcap comic,
Groucho Marx.
With my stimulant of choice in hand, I returned to the living room and settled
in my recliner, reaching again for the remote, fully intending to switch from
the movie to a news channel. A Marx brothers movie was playing but it was near
the end. The caption on the screen gave the title of the movie as "A Night At
The Opera", starring the Marx Brothers.
The narrative presented below is not intended as a critical review of "A Night
at the Opera", the cast, or the medium. I have no letters of degree that qualify
me for such an undertaking and I have no wish to make such an assessment. The
movie has been widely acclaimed as a classic and, according to many, rates among
the best of that genre. The recent broadcast of the film was indeed the stimulus
for this article and while some specific scenes, events or characters may be
mentioned they are of little consequence to this presentation and there is no
attempt to judge , rate, enhance or discredit their performance, appropriateness
or desirability. They are important only in what they may represent. Before I
continue, I will point our that I am not a devotee of the Marx brothers, but
have on occasions watched them perform. Their satirical blend of burlesque,
vaudeville, surrealism, comedy and drama is not my choice of amusement or
entertainment, however, I acknowledge and respect that others may view them
differently. All references to the film or to the cast are used only to
illustrate how art often imitates life. In this case most proficiently.
I cannot say precisely why I did not act on my intent to find some source of
news on that Saturday morning or why I the tele remained tuned to that broadcast
while I watched the final minutes of mayhem. Most likely some bizarre antic or
senseless remark caught my attention and held my curiosity captive. Having tuned
in to the movie so late, I could only guess what the plot might be, and I
guessed that the brothers (all three) were trying to get a contract signed and
would stop at nothing to accomplish their goal. Later reading a short review of
that movie proved my guess to be right.
For those who have not seen the movie, I offer this brief summary of the final
scenes:
Patrons of the opera, all suitably dressed for the occasion , the men in tuxedos
and women in formal evening wear, were properly seated waiting the opening of
the opera. (Pretty stuff -shirt stuff), while the Marx brothers ran around
back-stage committing their usual madcap atrocities on reasonably sane members
of the cast. The brothers had earlier. replaced the sheet music for the opera
with the score of "Take Me Out to the Ballgame". When the curtain opened , the
brothers were creating havoc among the opera performers and when the music
began, two of the brothers were in the orchestra. After a brief time of
pretending to conduct two sections of the orchestra., the music changed to "Take
Me Out to the Ballgame", and the two brothers began playing pitch. Following
more outrageous shenanigans, one of the tricksters wound up climbing around in
the staging (ropes) that ;operate the large canvas background scenes, causing
them, to rise and fall haphazardly and finally ,swinging from the ropes, one
brother crashed through one of the large canvases The opera was in total
disarray, however the contract did get signed and the final musical number went
off reasonably well. While all the madness and mayhem was taking place, more
rational members of the cast were trying to restore or maintain order. The
situation is beyond my limited ability to describe, so I suggest. if you wish to
see things more clearly, you rent the video.
When the curtains rose in the opening scene of the opera, the prim and proper
patrons were dismayed by the unexpected butchery of the script and the music and
they raised their voices in protest. As the lunacy continued, becoming even
wilder at times, the dismay of the audience began to subside and when the final
act was finished, the audience rose to a standing ovation. The audience who at
first resembled some degree of normalcy and had responded so negatively to the
opening chaos was reduced to a level of complacency and acceptance of the
madness taking place all around them, by the behavior of three demented players.
In only a few moments of watching this movie, the similarity of the frenzied and
deranged behavior and dialog of the film to all that is taking place on capitol
hill became strikingly clear. While We The people raise their voice in protest
and Conservatives try to maintain some degree of order, more Liberal members of
Congress ignore the voice of the people and continue to cause havoc and
pandemonium. The remarks by Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi that "we have to
pass the bill so we can find out what's in it" is as insidious a remark as any
insane line from A Night at the Opera. The poignant question remains unanswered.
will We The People become like the patrons of the opera and succumb to the
forces of fundamental change and morph into some unknown, unspecified social
ideology , or will We The People cast off the uncertainty of the unknown and
restore the status quo on which to build a future for our children?. Which do
they deserve? We own the present, they inherit the future.
Fact
of the Matter
Fact of the matter is...there's a couple of things that
have troubled me for a good long while and "fact of the matter" is, I'm "sick
and tired" of the many journalists, pundits, analysts, editors,. celebrities,
faux comedians, media experts, presidents, janitors. late night talk show host,
certain professors that appear regularly on TV and all others who preface their
OPINIONS and REPRESENT THEM AS FACTS, with the worn-out, over-used and highly
abused expression "FACT OF THE MATTER". I hear it on Fox, on CNN, on talk radio
and in the pool hall, .....it's everywhere,.....wherever armchair experts
congregate, from the White House to the craphouse and it really gets my goat.
Listen for it! Can the idiots who use that stupid phrase actually believe it
validates their remarks or adds to their credibility? It is incredulous that
anyone would think so. Must they so often avoid personal responsibility for
their own opinions by alluding to some evidence they never present, and expect
us to take their word as fact simply because they say it's fact. That's a
rickety crutch that should send an instant warning to Watch Out For This Guy,
He's Got An Issue To Spin:. . Most of us are like Sergeant Joe Friday, "We just
want the facts, Mam. Just the facts". If we cannot believe whomever may be
speaking, why would we be any more inclined to believe them when they preface
their remark with "fact of the matter is"?
Fact of the matter is.... it's all pretty dumb..
"Fact of the matter is", as much as I abhor the use of the Fact Of The Matter
ploy (and this ain't no spin) , there is another overworked expression used by
too many congresspersons that I find even more offensive. It's the old "Just A
Drop-In-The-Bucket" PLOY. You know what I mean. It's that ELECTED congressperson
whose casual remarks may go something like this, , "Well, that 128 million
dollars earmarked to make an environmental friendly habitat for SPANISH MOSS is
'JUST A DROP IN THE BUCKET', much too small an amount to be bothered with so
we'll just go ahead and invest that 128 mil. on behalf of Spanish moss, or some
other similar asinine DROP IN THE BUCKET remark about some un-needed, unwanted,
costly and totally useless window dressing project for their district. See what
I mean? Far too many of the bums we send to the capitol who are supposed to
represent us and who ARE EXPECTED TO BE GOOD STEWARDS of taxpayers money are far
to cavalier with the tax dollars that working folks are required to pay, while
their only product is division. Try putting a container under a drip sometimes
and see how much it accumulates.
Yeah! I know, We are in the season of Peace and Goodwill, Hope and Love and that
my rant would be more appropriate at a different time, so I will say no more but
with so many workers unemployed for so long a time and knowing the sadness they
must feel, my contempt for the breakdown in national leadership shades the
cheerfulness of this season.
Still, I wish for one and all, a Safe, Glorious and
Christ filled Christmas and a Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year. God Bless
Us, Everyone.
by 1Tea-edTexan
This just in, Alert! Alert! I
heard it on the news
Tis naught to fear Save Fear itself If you will pay my Dues
Big Brother bids you come to me and bend unto my Will
Sip from my Cup of Bitter Wine and Taste my bitter Pill
I beg you give me of your Praise and Homage that I Crave
My Favors I will grant to you from Cradle to the Grave
All bitterness will fade and pass as we become as one
To change the Fate of all Mankind and bring the End of Christendom
Come let me fill your earthen Cup with all that you desire
And Social Progress be the path to all that we aspire
Our hearts and minds so intertwined And filled with Social Swill
Will be the Savior of our kind And all our Dreams fulfill
More perfectly this Orb will be With all of one accord
When those who struggled to be free Have failed beneath my sword
Big Brother bids you walk away From Gods that once you knew
Tis for the Greater Good, you know, But only for us Few
Fear not your Loss of Liberty, So Minor of a thing
So small the Ransom to be paid to make Big Brother King
Both king and Godhead now in one Will save us in his keep
And feed us with his table scrap But Rob us while we sleep
Big Brother knows what's Best for you His Insight all Supreme
But Hark! We've heard that Trill before Tis' but the Same old Scheme
The Omnipresence Brother brings His Thought Police and More
Reflect the Horror once foretold in nineteen-hundred-eighty-four
Nineteen-hundred-eighty-four refers to the futuristic novel ("1984") by George
Orwell, first published in 1949. It deals with a central character whose work is
to change history
by rewriting old newspaper accounts to conform with "New age truths" as
determined by
Party elitists. (Note Michelle Obama's remarks about changing our history) The
novel was later made into a movie with Richard Burton a co-star. War has become
perpetual with shortage and rationing of all commodities. An oppressive Big
Brother government is the antagonist with Thought Police, Word Police and Food
Police....and more
Another Veterans' Day has come and gone and we have been reminded of the great sacrifices so many have made and the great sacrifices that so many continue to make in the purchase and assurance of our liberty. Veterans' Day began in 1918 when hostilities between Germany and the United States ended and an armistice was signed. President Woodrow Wilson declared a federal holiday on the eleventh day of the eleventh month, and proclaimed Armistice Day to honor veterans of WWI. In 1954, President Dwight D. Eisenhower and the sitting Congress passed a bill changing the name from Armistice Day to Veterans' Day IN HONOR OF ALL VETERANS.
I cannot recall any words of tribute or any sentiment more profound that honors all veterans and our Republic than the words of President Lincoln at the dedication of the Gettysburg National Cemetery. That speech became known as the Gettysburg Address, which I repeat below.
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania
November 19, 1863
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a
new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men
are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether this nation, or any
other nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a
battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a
final resting place for those who here gave their lives that the nation might
live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do so.
Bur in a larger sense, we can not dedicate - we can not consecrate - we can not
hallow - this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have
consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will
little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what
they did here. It is for us, the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the
unfinished work with which they who here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is
rather for us to be dedicated to the great task remaining before us - that from
these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave
the last full measure of devotion - that we highly resolve that these dead shall
not have perished in vain - that this nation under God, shall have a new birth
of freedom - and that government of the people, by the people, for the people,
shall not perish from the earth.
************Sincere
appreciation for all Veterans.....we salute you and we remember************.
1TeaedTexan
Texas Declares War on the USA
Editors note, the following
was sent to us as an e-mail. In these trying times it is good to see that some
people still have a sense of humor.
I have no idea who wrote this it but it is great! Thanks for sending this
Dilbert.
Texas Declares War on
the USA....ONLY IN TEXAS ????
President Barack Obama was in the Oval Office when his
telephone rang. "Hello, President Obama” a heavily accented southern voice said.
"This is Archie, down here at Goliad Texas , I am callin' to tell ya’ll that we
are officially declaring war on ya!"
"Well Archie," Barack replied, "This is indeed important news! How big is your
army?"
"Right now," said Archie, after a moments calculation "there is myself, my
cousin Harold, my next-door-neighbor Randy,
and the whole dart team from Hooters. That makes eight!"
Barack paused. "I must tell you Archie that I have one million men in my army
waiting to move on my command."
"Wow," said Archie. "I'll have ta call ya back!"
Sure enough, the next day, Archie called again. " Mr. Obama , the war is still
on!
We have managed to acquire some infantry equipment!"
"And what equipment would that be Archie?" Barack asked.
"Well sir, we have two combines, a bulldozer, and Harry’s John Deere tractor."
President Obama sighed. "I must tell you Archie, that I have 16,000 tanks and
14,000 armored personnel carriers.
Also I've increased my army to one and a half million since we last spoke."
"Lord above", said Archie, "I'll be getting back to ya."
Sure enough, Archie rang again about twenty minutes later.. " President Obama ,
the war is still on!
We have managed to git ourselves airborne!
We up an' modified Harolds's ultra-light with a couple of shotguns in the
cockpit, and four boys from the Legion have joined us as well!"
Barack was silent for a minute then cleared his throat. "I must tell you Archie
that I have 10,000 bombers and 20,000 fighter planes.
My military complex is surrounded by laser-guided, surface-to-air missile sites.
And since we last spoke, I've increased my army to TWO MILLION!"
"Well, crap," said Archie, "l'll have ta call you back."
Sure enough, Archie called again the next day. " President Obama ! I am sorry to
have to tell you that we have had to call off this here war."
"I'm sorry to hear that" said Barack . "Why the sudden change of heart?"
Well, sir," said Archie, "we've all sat ourselves down and had a long chat over
a few beers,
and come to realize that there's just no way we can feed two million
prisoners.."
TEXAS CONFIDENCE CANNOT BE SHAKEN
IN GOD WE TRUST
Obamacare, Obamacare
George Bush is gone
Look what you've done to me
It's your job now
You took away the things I love
You can't blame him again
And gave me misery
He ain't your whipping boy no more
No work in sight, my bills past due
Don't try that crap again
I'm
running
out
of luck
You had your chance
You say it's for the greater good
You screwed it up
But you don't give a....(Pause 2-3 beats.)
You blew it all away
Tinkers damn
You took the country
Cause you just pass the buck.
Down the tube
And now it's time to change your ways.
Obama gave away my job
And shipped it overseas
Obamacare, Obamacare
He gave away our country's wealth
Look what you done to me
And brought us to our knees
You took away the things I love
He wiped away my IRA
And gave me misery
and
my security
No work in sight,
my bills past due
And left a level playing field
I'm running out of luck
Of equal poverty
You say it's for the greater good
But you don't give a.....(Pause 2-3
bets)
Obamacare, Obamacare
Tinkers damn
Look what you done
to
me
Cause you just pass the buck
You took away the things I love
And gave me misery
No work in sight,
my bills past due
I'm
running out of luck
You say its for the greater good
But you don't give a......(pause 2-3 beats).
Tinkers damn
Cause you just pass the buck
In the
chorus where it calls or a pause of 2-3 beats, Slapping the guitar twice may be
effective.
A simple melody with some good "pickin" would
be great.
Columbus, New Mexico, named after the
early explorer Christopher Columbus, is a small farming and ranching village
situated in Luna county in southwestern New Mexico, just three miles north of
the border. The tranquil atmosphere and hard but unhurried rural lifestyle bears
little resemblance of earlier days when Columbus was, for a brief period, the
largest settlement in New Mexico bustling with
noisy commercial and military activity.
A turn of the century railroad depot has been refurbished and converted
to a Railroad Depot Museum with authentic relics and photographs of an earlier
time when the Mexican bandit/folk hero/ insurgent, Pancho Villa with his
Villistas, and other desperadoes raided villages along the border to support
their resistance to the leadership of Mexico's president, Venustiano Carranza.
The early history of Columbus brings to mind scenes from the 1960 cinema, The
Magnificent Seven" with Eli Wallache playing the role of Calvera, fictional
ruthless leader of a band of Mexican outlaws that periodically
raided and terrorized a poor Mexican village.
Rising to the rank of General, under the Porfirio Diaz
administration, Victoriano Huerta pledged his support to the new
president Francisco Madero when Diaz went into exile.
However, Huerta plotted with Henry Lane Wilson, U.S. Ambassador to Mexico
and Felix Diaz (Nephew of Porfirio) to overthrow Madero.
The conspiracy is known as
La decena tragica
in Mexican
history.
In February 1913, the
conspiracy was completed
when Huerta had
Madero and his vice president, Jose Suarez arrested and sent into exile.
Coming ashore at Tampico, in an unarmed whaleboat from the
gunboat, USS Dolphin, to pick up a supply of gasoline, the unarmed
sailors were taken into custody by federalist troops and detained at Huerta's
military headquarters.
The American
sailors were later released, unharmed, and allowed to return to their boat.
General Ignacio Zaragoza contacted the American consul and apologized for
the events, also
sending
his regrets to Rear Admiral Henry Mayo, anchored offshore.
Mayo demanded that the American flag be raised and saluted in the city
and that a formal apology be made.
Huerta's government refused to raise and salute the American flag and President
Wilson began moving additional naval forces to the Mexican coast.
On April 20th. Wilson addressed Congress detailing the incidents that
demonstrated Mexico's (Huerta's)
contempt for the United States and asked for Congressional approval to use
military action, if necessary, to maintain the dignity and authority of the
United States.
While Wilson's request was stalled in the Senate, the State Department was
tracking a shipment of small-arms aboard the Hamberg-American liner, SS Ypiringa.
Wilson had refused to recognize the Huerta administration as the official
government of Mexico and did not want the small arms to go to Huerta to be
used to crush the rebellion. Without waiting for Congressional approval,
Wilson instructed the Secretary of the Navy, Josephus Daniels to "take Veracruz
at once" and to seize the small arms shipment. With a landing force of
about 350 leathernecks and 300 bluejackets, the custom house, post office,
telegraph office, railroad terminal, the rail yard, and power plant were
captured. The waterfront and the port had been secured. On April 30th, the
U.S. Army 5th Reinforced Brigade arrived and occupied the city. for seven months
ending in late November. American casualties numbered 19 killed and 72 wounded.
Mexican losses amounted to 172 killed and 250 wounded. When American
forces were withdrawn, Mexico severed diplomatic relations with the United
States. Wilson's provocative action had served to unite the two Mexicans
competing for political power, Venustiano Carranza and Victoriana Huerta.
Following the occupation of Veracruz, and the ascendency of Venustiano Carranza
to the presidency and the recognition of his government by the United States. in
October 1915, relations between the two governments were hampered by outlaw
gangs and insurgents operating along their common border. Francisco "Pancho"
Villa, commanding revolutionary forces in northern Mexico (now rebelling against
Carranza) was angered when the United States recognized the Carranza government
as the official government of Mexico. In retaliation, Villa and his
Villistas began attacks against American citizens. In the northern
state of Chihuahua, the Villistas stopped a train and removed seventeen American
passangers and executed them. Other attacks occurred along the border as targets
presented themselves.
In the predawn hours of March 9, 1916, Villa and 500 of his men crossed
the border and made a savage attack on the village of Columbus, New Mexico
and the detachment of the 13th US Cavalry Regiment stationed there.
Eighteen Americans were killed and eight were wounded. Villa lost about 67
of his rebel band but was successful in confiscating a number of horses, mules
and guns to support his revolution.
The assault on Columbus was the first act of aggression by a foreign entity on
US soil since the Revolutionary War and Americans were outraged. Villa's
incursion into the United States forced President Woodrow Wilson to initiate an
appropriate military response. Wilson gave the order to Secretary of War,
Newton Baker, to undertake a punitive expedition into Mexico and to
capture Pancho Villa. Brigadier General John J. (Black Jack) Pershing,
veteran of the Indian Wars, was to lead the expedition. Pershing marshaled
his forces that included horses and pack animals, and 10,000 troops, airplanes
and a convoy of trucks at Columbus. With permission from Mexican President
Carranza to pursue Villa within the state of Chihuahua (but no farther) Pershing
began what was to become known as Pancho Villa Punitive Expedition. COVERING
THEIR REAR, IN JUNE 1916, PRESIDENT WILSON CALLED-UP 110,000 NATIONAL
GUARDSMEN AND DEPLOYED THEM ALONG THE BORDER.
Long before Villa's attack on Columbus and Pershing had made ready for his
incursion into
Negotiations between the two governments taking place at El Paso, Texas,
produced an agreement that the United States would withdraw their military
forces if Mexico (Carranza) would guarantee to control Villa. On February
5th. 1917, the last of the American forces were removed to Fort Bliss, Texas and
the Punitive Expedition was officially concluded.
On a side note: General Pershing admitted that the expedition had failed
to accomplish it's objective to capture Villa and that Villa had outwitted him
(Pershing) and out-bluffed him at every turn, and he complained that President
Wilson had placed too many restrictions on the expedition.
The expedition gave birth to the first mechanized military supply train, in
which Dodge trucks were used to ferry supplies and equipment from Columbus to
the theater of operations; The first armored vehicles, which were the
forerunners of modern day tanks, were used here for the first time; and
motorcycles were, for the first time, used in combat; the mission also involved
the first use of airplanes in combat conditions, Our entire air force,
consisting of eight planes, was reassigned to Columbus, Captain Benjamin
Foulois' First Aero Squadron, Flying JN-3/4 Jenny's provided scouting and
reconnaissance for the expedition, flying so low that they carried grenades for
defense and shot back at ground troops. Much of the logistical and tactical
experience gained in the expedition was to be utilized in America's
involvement in WW1 that would soon follow.
I
The bold action of President Wilson in authorizing the 1916 Pancho Villa
Punitive Expedition, sending 10,000 troops into Mexico in pursuit of the outlaw
Villa and his gang, and his deployment of 110,000 National Guardsmen along the
border effectively quelled the violence, restored security to the border land
and forced the Mexican government to deal more effectively with it's internal
criminal elements.
Now there's a word that I haven't heard or used for a good
many years.
It was pretty
commonplace way back when, when I made a bi-weekly pilgrimage to the local pool hall, but in recent years it has all but dropped from
frequent usage.
It's a good word tho
and very similar to another old expression "behind the eight ball".
Snookered comes from the word snooker, which is a game of pocket
billiards, said to have been invented in 1889, by British officers serving in
India.
In the game of Snooker,
"snookered" means to make a shot deliberately leaving the cue ball in a position
so that the next player does not have a clear shot at the next target ball so
that the shooter must play the cue ball off a cushion,
In general usage, "snookered" is given to mean to have deliberately led
someone
or to have been deliberately
led, or
to have deliberately left
someone, or to have been deliberately left in a position in which all possible
choices are undesirable, or to have deliberately
trapped someone or to have been deliberately trapped, or, to deceive
(Note:
snooker or snookered is an
act of deliberation.)
"Snookered" came back into play several weeks ago during the
Sherry Sherrod debacle.
Andrew
Breitbart, released a three minute snippet of a speech of
Sherrod speaking at a NAACP meeting.
Sherrod, an African-American, was commenting on an event that happened
earlier in her career (1986)with the Department of Agriculture, that forced her to deal fairly with a white farmer in spite of her
initial feelings to do otherwise.
She concluded her presentation by noting that the issue was resolved with
fairness and honor and Sherrod's action was instrumental in saving the white
man's farm.
The short excerpt from the forty-three minute speech gave
the impression that Sherrod had acted improperly and denied assistance to the
white farmer along racial lines.
However, this was not the case but that fact was not made clear in the portion
of her speech that was released by Breitbart..
The focus of Sherrod's
story
was to illustrate how she, as an African-American, had to overcome her own bias,
perhaps using her own example to
encourage members of her audience to do the same.
When the selected extract from the Sherrod speech hit the
public airways, she received a phone call from a government official, presumably
from the Department of Agriculture, telling her that the White House wanted her
to resign.
And the caller demanded
that she resign immediately and over the phone.
Acting solely on the video clip, and without bothering to verify the
accuracy of the information, "White House officials"
impulsively decided to discharge this 62-year old grandmother
After the entire video of Mrs. Sherrod's speech was shown
and the true context of her statements were made known, Tom Vilsack, Department of Agriculture Secretary, offered an apology
along with a job offer.
President Barack Obama followed-up with a phone call of pacification, urging
Sherrod to take the job offer.
And
Benjamin Jealous, National President NAACP, stated "With regard to the initial
media coverage of the resignation of USDA Shirley Sherrod, we have come to the
conclusion we were snookered by Fox News and Tea Party Activist Andrew Brietbart
into believing she had harmed white farmers because of racial bias".
Later, Jalous added, "Having reviewed the full tape, spoken
to Mrs. Sherrod, and most importantly heard the testimony of the white farmer
mentioned in this story, we now believe the organization that edited the
documents did so with the intention of deceiving millions of Americans".
Bret Baier, Fox News anchor to "Special Report" responded to
the allegations by saying that Fox News did not "snooker" the NAACP or anyone
else over the story.
Baier said that
Fox News didn't even do the story, that they (Fox) posted it online.
The story, in and of itself, is noteworthy but hardly
deserving of the reactionary response by White House officials or the explosive
media commentary
that followed.
It is, however, a classic example of how easily we are all distracted from
more pressing concerns and we are too often snookered by a media sideshows.
WAKE UP
AMERICA!
YOU HAVE BEEN SNOOKERED! You have been snookered all
right.
You and me and the guy next
door, the whole lot of us.
Makes no
difference if you are Democrat, Republican, Independent, a Tea Party person or
someone who just plain don't give a hoot about politics or politicians or the
world we live in.
This is the United
States of America and WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER, and we will
sink or swim together.
WE'VE BEEN LIED TO, PALS!
We've been lied to so publically, so openly and so frequently that we
don't even challenge it anymore. We have been lied to by
Progressive politicians and an agenda driven media, all
of whom are the intended benefficiaries of their
own prevarications.
Since the
turn of the last century,
the lies
and distortions of the Progressive movement have advanced their agenda, year
after year,
in small increments,
until the once passive-aggressive resistance by the movement has become an open
assault on Capitalism and Democracy, spurred on by some egalitarian
dream.
The big push for the Progressive agenda began in earnest in
February 2008 when Michelle Obama, wife of presidential candidate Barack Obama ,
started to debase America by saying
that she had been
never proud of her
country.
Two weeks later, in a
campaign speech in Wisconsin, she continued to scorn America by saying that our
country is "just downright mean".
Other contemptuous remarks
by
Mrs. Obama
suggesting that life in
America was far from good were, "we are guided by fear",
we are a country divided,
and
we are a nation of cynics, sloths and complacents.
This negative and totally false
assessment
of America has
been echoed many times over by Progressive
politicians at every level of government to rationalize a need for their
"brand" of redistributive change or "fundamental transformation".
We've heard it over and over...."the status quo is broken", Capitalism
doesn't work anymore", "the economy is not sustainable", "the Constitution is a
charter of negative liberties",
"the Constitution does not work in this modern day society"....and the
list goes on....THESE ARE THE LIES THAT YOU HAVE HEARD AND THESE ARE THE
LIES THAT PROGRESSIVES WANT YOU TO BELIEVE.
T H E Y
W A N T
Y O U
T O
S U R R E N D E R
T O
T H E I R
S O C I A L
A G E N D A!
Well, HEADS UP AMERICA,
We have been snookered!
We have been deliberately led to a place
where most of us do not want to be, where
the future is unclear and decision making is hampered by lies,
distortions, half truths and false hope.
But this one thing is crystal clear...... mid-term elections will either
put us back on the path of tried and true Constitutional government or we'll
plunge headlong down that dark and
uncertain
path leading to the often
tried but always failed
socialist
form of government.
Beware of global
government.....Do not let our country become an endangered species.
If You Ain't Mad, You Should Be!
Sometimes someone says or does something so insanely
stupid that it really sets you off, or as one talk show TV personality
frequently says, makes
"blood shoot out of your eyes".
While I am not generally prone to anger of that magnitude, and
because I have a high regard for the opinion of others,
I am rarely pressed to that level
of anger or frustration.
But off the wall IS off the wall
and you cannot ignore stupidity.
With all the CRAP (think about it) that Congress and the Obama
administration is causing and
all they are permitting to happen, maybe now is not a good time to comment
on Obesity, Maybe with so much
attention focused on unemployment, and
the tsunami of Illegal
Mexicans streaming across
southern borders, the controversy over the Arizona Immigration Law and
intimidation by the Department
of Justice and so many other
important issues including mid-term elections.
pressing concern over the health care debacle, a lethargic Congress
and an arrogant president that pursues his ideological agenda while failing
in all areas of his responsibilities, it may seem inappropriate to even
mention the commonplace issue of
obesity.
Anyway.... I drove along the west-bound
interstate listening to
commentary by the host, an endless
array of commercials and occasional listeners calling in with their
comments. The dialog remained
pretty low-keyed for the most part.
After awhile the subject
shifted to obesity, you know, that national pandemic that has infected
America. There was some
discussion of the government's role in all this,
requiring additional information on fast food restaurant menus and
even restricting the use of salt in some areas.
There seemed to be general agreement between folks calling-in and the
host that it was not up to the government to dictate the eating habits of
anyone. It was
natural for government law suits against fast food chain McDonalds to
enter in the discussion.
Reportedly there are two different suits against McDonalds.
One plaintiff is suing the fast food giant for including
toys with their "Happy Meals".
A different plaintiff is suing McDs for the "food content" of their
Happy Meals". I am no dietician
but I am a parent and a grand-parent and
I can tell you this, It is both the toys and the food content that
make a Happy Meal Happy. And
having purchased a goodly number of
Happy Meals (with toys) I
can attest to this truth, Happy
Meals do make happy kids.
I
was a "shake-my-head-in-disbelief" kind of annoyed with the
government's intrusion into personal eating choices and the pending
litigation against McDonalds, but my blood pressure remained in the vicinity
of near normal until the next lady called in with her comment.
This caller spoke excellent English.
She seemed to be well educated and
appeared to be sober, but the comment she made brought the vital
fluids to a boil and
left me muttering obscenities I
have not vocalized since my old navy days and wondering what part of the
galaxy she lived in. I mean I
was livid with anger. This person is at the low-end-of-stupid, and what's
even more disturbing is the fact that there are too many others like her.
I suppose by now you may wonder what could possibly have been
said that would infuriate this mild mannered old timer .
Well, here it comes. But
first, with respect for girls, women and ladies the world over, I will refer
to this person of the feminine gender only
as she or her.
She said that McDonald Happy Meals (meaning the availability of) puts
parents in the position of having to say no to their
children. HORRIBLE!
HORRIBLE!
NASTY OLD FOOD CHAIN FORCES PARENTS TO
DENY CHILD OF FOOD CHOICE.
Where is this she-person coming from?
Is her parent/child relationship so dismally insecure that she can no
longer say a simple NO when it is in the best interest of
her child? God
help her and God help the child.
Maybe its best for her to stay away from McDonalds, yeah, maybe it's
best for her to stay away from restaurants altogether.
Yeah! Save your money and
take some night classes in parenting.
The Cimarron Strip - No Man's Land
A few older readers may remember the western adventure
television series, "Cimarron Strip", from about forty years
ago, (1967-1968). It was a short-run fictional depiction of frontier life
in and around Cimarron City in what is now the panhandle of Oklahoma. The
series, produced by the creators of "Gunsmoke" (one of my
all time favorites) starred Stuart Whitman as Marshall Jim Crown. Before the
Cimarron Strip was fictionalized and romanticized by the entertainment
industry, the "Strip", also known as "No Man's Land" was a
narrow, 170 mile strip of land that lay to the West of Indian Territory,
sandwiched in between Kansas and Colorado on the North, New Mexico to the
West and
Texas to the South. It was a harsh, hostile and lawless patch of land where
only the strongest could survive but
home to many desperadoes, there to avoid civil authorities.
From Wikipedia: "No mans land is a term for land that is not
occupied or is under dispute between parties that
will not occupy it because of fear or uncertainty. The term was originally
used to define a contested territory
or dumping ground for refuse between two fiefdoms. It is most commonly
associated with the First World War
to describe the area of land between two enemy trenches that neither side
wishes to openly
move on or take control of due to fear of being attacked by the enemy
in the process"
"The Oxford English Dictionary contains a reference to the term dating back
to 1320, and spelt
nonesmanneslond, when the term was used to describe a disputed territory
or one over which there was legal disagreement".
From 1806 to 1821, the western border of the newly acquired Louisiana
Purchase remained disputed between the United States and New Spain (Texas).
The U.S. claimed the Rio Grande as the western boundary, based on a
temporary settlement back in 1684, while Spain claimed Arroyo Hondo as the
western boundary of the purchase. To avoid prolonged argument, the
U.S. settled on the Sabine River as the western border while the Spanish
held to Arroyo Hondo. The area covered by the agreement, that patch of
real estate between Arroyo Hondo and the Sabine River, became known as
Neutral Ground, it also became known as the Neutral Territory, the
Neutral Strip, No Man's Land of Louisiana and the Sabine Free State.
Both governments declared that the disputed area would be off limits to
soldiers of both countries and stipulated that occupancy by settlers would
not be permitted. Neither government made provisions for policing the
disputed territory and despite
the agreement, settlers from the U.S and from New Spain migrated to the
lawless land. The absence of civil authorities attracted exiles, deserters,
political refugees, fortune hunters and a variety of criminals. In 1821, in
an agreement setting the western border at the Sabine River, Spain
surrendered any further claim to the area. Even after the boundary was
agreed on and No Man's Land officially became part of the United States,
this "No Man's Land" remained largely without civil authority for years and
the Regulator-Moderator War in East Texas in 1839-1844 was rooted in the
anarchy of the lawless era of No Man's Land.
Wilfred Owen, British poet and a casualty of World War I,
wrote that No Man's Land (on the battlefield) is
"the abode of madness".
In more recent years, as political division and territorial disputes spread
around the globe,
the term "No Man's Land" has found broader applications.
In the southwest quadrant of the United States, in the state of Arizona, an
undeclared, modern day, de facto
"No Man's Land" has taken root. This forbidden zone is not
a matter of a formal territorial dispute or a condition of declared (or
undeclared) war. It has come about because the federal governments, on both
sides of their common border, have demonstrated an unwillingness to secure
the border and maintain their national sovereignty.
The failure, by both governments, to control their border has severe and
long term social and economic consequences. On the Mexican side, Mexico is
depleting their most valuable resource, it's people.
By failure to control emigration, Mexican authorities are squandering the
potential lifetime economic output
of all who cross the border as well as Mexico's ability to maintain their
ethnic population and cultural identity.
The United States, on the other hand, by failing to control the border and
immigration, is forced to deal with the adverse economic consequence of an
unregulated surge of migrants who,
unable to find work, become dependent on the state, stretching resources to
the limit.
Compounding the broad and complicated issues of illegal immigration and
large numbers of undocumented people, border violence is increasing at an
alarming rate. Drug smuggling, human trafficking, gun trading, rape,
kidnapping and even murder threaten border communities on both sides. It is
unclear how conditions of Mexican communities just below the border have
been debased but it is apparent that lawlessness is widespread and
conditions are worsening. Recently seventy two persons were killed,
allegedly by members of a Mexican drug cartel,
in one small town near the border.
North of the border conditions are only slightly better. Lawlessness
continues to accelerate making some areas unsafe for both property owners
and tourists and creating a de facto No Man's Land. This
is evidenced by signs posted alongside and to the south of Interstate 8,
between Casa Grande and Gila Bend, seventy to eighty miles north of the
border. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have closed large portions of
public land in and around Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge. One report
states that Mexican drug cartels now control large areas of Southern
Arizona. Another source reports that three counties in Southern Arizona are
so overrun with armed illegals that, in a half-hearted attempt to protect
U.S. citizens federal authorities were forced to erect the warning signs.
Properties under the direct jurisdiction of Department of the Interior and
the Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service have been
adversely affected in addition to other lands used by the general public.
Signs erected by the Bureau of Land Management contain the following
warnings:
Cracker Jack is that tasty
molasses covered peanut and popcorn confection introduced to the public at the
Columbia Exposition, 1893 Chicago's World Fair. Elevated to a cultural
icon in the "Take Me Out to the Ball Game" lyrics, "buy me some peanuts and
Cracker Jack", this palate pleasing treat has remained a favorite among
youngsters and brings out the kid in everyone.
From the official Cracker Jack website: "Cracker Jack,
prior to being associated with the Carmel coated popcorn and peanut treat, was
slang for something considered really great. Much the way people today use
the word "awesome", people then used the word" crackerjack".
Packaging was redesigned in 2002, but formerly Cracker
Jack came in a brightly colored box that featured the image of a sailor
(perhaps from the British term Jack tar meaning sailor) and his dog Bingo.
Taste like that needed little additional incentive to purchase, still the offer
of a "prize in every box " was a strong factor in the marketing strategy and
overall success. Each box was prominently marked " Prize in Every Box",
but the nature of the prize was never known prior to the purchase.
YOU HAD TO BUY THE BOX TO FIND OUT WHAT WAS IN IT! It was a
crapshoot and the "prize" was often disappointing.
Prizes came in a variety of materials with
assorted themes. From small leaf of paper featuring a cartoon or word
puzzle, to miniature plastic charms and metallic whistles and diminutive
devices that spin. The prizes were novel but of no commercial value
. Consequently most were discarded and destroyed. Today,
collectors look for early Cracker Jack premiums. Early pieces,
particularly baseball cards from 1915 era, are prized among collectors and
though they have no utility or usefulness, they bring premium prices on the
collectors market.
But enough about Cracker Jack. The point I'm trying
to make here is the Democrat packaging of Obamacare and the way it was sold to
the public. It was a crapshoot, a madness to vote on federal legislation
that few, if any, congressmen had read on the insane urging of Speaker, Nancy
Pelosi that "we have to pass it so we can find out what's in it".
Now that some of the provisions and the cost and effects
of Obamacare are becoming known, many are disappointed, disillusioned and
concerned with cost. The bill was packaged like Cracker Jack, but it
IS NOT a novelty and it IS NOT a prize. It is a staggering piece of
stupidity and it should take the path of early Cracker Jack inducements.
REPEAL THE BILL!
Remember in November........I LOVE IT!
I cannot claim ownership of that slogan but I claim a strong kinship to
the message because those three simple words speak loudly of what has happened
to our Republic and how it got this way.
In mid-August, New York Times columnist and dirt merchant, Maureen Dowd, in her
column related to the Ground Zero Mosque, also known as the 9/11 Victory Mosque,
recently and more affectionately known as the Park 51 Project, titled, "Going
Mad in Herds", after stating that ..."Obama is the head of the dysfunctional
family of America -a rational man running a most irrational nation, a
high-minded man in a low-minded age", continued her verbal assault on opponents
of the mosque, which, by the way, included family and friends of
9/11 casualties, by adding....."The dispute over the "Islamic
Center"(note: no longer called a mosque) has tripped some deep national
lunacy",....then went on with her insensitive rant
to say
that "many Americans
haven't flushed the trauma of 9/11 out of their system...".......WOW!
Pity, pity.
poor Maureen.
Seems her acid wit must have
eaten away whatever
grey matter this
once-upon-a-time Pulitzer Prize winner may have ever had.
Now
unable to recognize
danger till it knocks on her door.(I hear it knocking from here)
But hang-in-there Maureen,
The country will get right back to you when we recover from our "deep national
lunacy" right after the
"weird mass
nervous breakdown" you alluded to.
You can put that on your calendar for
around
November the 3rd., you
know, the day
after mid-term
federal elections.
Maybe
we'll even start buying newspapers again, maybe even the Times.
Gosh, won't that be great?
Maybe fraulein Maureen should compose a follow up to her "Going Mad in Herds"
critique.
She might label
it, "Getting Mad in Droves", and to make it real, real easy for liberals
(and a lot of us rednecks)
to
understand, she could explain why politicians and journalist are scared to call
those who took down the two trade towers terrorists, but have no compunctions
about calling teaparty participants fear mongers and hate mongers.
and, and, and, WHY they say that people who behead the infidels, stone
their women and keep blowing up shit, are of a peaceful religion.
There just has to be a
simple
and logical reason but I just don't get it.
Look around lady!
There's
millions of us out here that have not flushed the horror of the holocaust out of
our system;
there's millions more
who have not flushed away the memories of December 7, 1941 and the bombing of
Pearl Harbor; HELL lady, I ain't over the massacre at the Alamo.
We ain't supposed to forget.
For most of us, it just ain't that easy to flush away the awareness and the
appreciation of those who have ensured our liberty with their life's blood,
including your freedom to critique those who see things differently, Remember
the Maine, Remember the Marne, Remember Pearl Harbor, Remember the Alamo...and
we will remember the trauma of 9/11.
HELL, WE DON'T WANT TO FORGET!
And We Will Remember in November.
WE
will remember
members in the House
of Representatives and
members of
the United States Senate
who
schemed and connived, coerced and bribed members of their own party to support
grievous and unwanted
legislation
that has
sabotaged our economy and
subverted our culture.
And we will
remember the president, Barack Hussein Obama, who has usurped the will of the
people and supplanted it with his own.
WE will remember.
We will
remember in November.
We will
remember and WE WILL VOTE. We will remember how we gathered
in townhall meetings and teaparty rallies across the country to express
our concerns.
We will remember that
we were rebuffed, ignored, criticized, vilified, demonized and insulted in every
way possible .
We will remember the
ridicule, the arrogance, the name calling and the obvious contempt our
legislators hold for those they are "supposed" to represent.
We will remember those who stoke the fires of racial discord, shred our
Constitution and
divide us into
factions.
YOU BET WE'LL REMEMBER!
There is too
much at stake.
I'll bet my size 11 West Texas Cowboy Boots that WE WILL REMEMBER
but I will not wager the future of my grandchildren on some "soon to be
forggotten" promise by
some high
minded, slick talking, career seeking, power grabbing
son of a gun from academia.
When
in doubt.......Take a Vacation.
That seems to be the prevailing attitude of the Obama
family. Yeah, Yeah, Yeah!
Everyone knows how difficult it is to make ends meet on
four and a half million a year and how stressful it is to entertain so many
socialites and celebrities between
trips to the links
impersonating the Tiger. .
But five vacations in six weeks (Martha's Vineyard
escape being an eleven day respite) just seems like too much of a good thing and
it makes those of us who are sick and tired of paying for those blatant excesses
a little sicker and a little tireder.
And most of us are sick and tired of
corrupt officials, misallocated funds,
government waste, excess spending, pork, coercion,
bribery, deceit, false hope, half truths , closed doors and
total lack of transparency.
We have been sick and tired so long that we are now sick
and tired of
being sick and tired,
even
sick and tired of others complaining
to be sick and tired
and are we ever
tired of that!. But, are those frequent and costly
vacations truly for therapeutic reasons, or, are they, more likely, staged photo
ops attempting
to convince the American people that they are real people,
just like us?
IT AIN'T WORKING!
Or might it be a duck and dodge routine to avoid tough
issues, of maybe he just plain doesn't know what to do next?
One of the most irksome issues on today's political scene is a president, with
his many czars, and
a Congress with one party majority in both Houses, who
proclaim on a daily basis that they "inherited this mess".
Nothing could be farther from the truth.
Barack Obama did not inherit the Presidency any more
than the Democrats Party inherited the Congress.
THEY BOUGHT IT!
THEY BOUGHT IT WITH ALL IT'S INHERENT PROBLEMS! They
bought it with
huge contributions and support from the entertainment industry,
THE NEWS MEDIA, college professors,
public educators, unions, lawyers and Wall Street
financiers that expected
to receive some benefit or special consideration
(usually of a financial nature)
and with smaller contributions from an electorate they
filled with
false
hope
whose only expectation
was a better and more secure America.
No Indeed!
They did not inherit anything.
THEY BOUGHT IT ALL!
And they paid dearly for i!.
From an
Open Secrets Blog (Investigating Money in Politics)
a communication released by the Center for Responsive
Politics, dated October 22,2008, predicted that the 2008 federal election for
the presidency and Congress would be the most costly in history and estimated
that the cost would be more than $5.3 billion dollars and that the cost for the
presidential election alone would be nearly $2.4 billion and that ain't exactly
small change.
The president, the Democrats, the liberals and the
progressives
begged for
it and they bought
it with your dollars.
They begged for your dollars and for your vote, they
begged
in every community , in every state and they passed out
promises they could
never keep.
The old "inherited this mess" cliché
just don't fly.
It never did!
But they still don't get it.
Ironically, the presidential candidate who pledged a new era of
hope under his administration, while denouncing the
failures of his predecessor, never acknowledging that, for two years,
his party was in control of both houses and
jointly responsible ,continues to hide behind THE Bush.
Almost daily, the president, his allies including his
friends in the media continue with the same old worn out campaign rhetoric
disparaging George Bush and the Republican Party, hiding behind Republican
failures and never admitting their
own. This is a total copout that never
ends.
HEY! .there's only one batter at the plate and he is responsible for his
own performance.
If the previous batter strikes out, SO BE IT!.
You don't berate him forever, There's only one
head-coach on any team. The team may take a shellacking but.....as the liberals
say(when it suits them), GET OVER IT....MOVE ON.
How shameful
that George and the Republicans did not leave the office
a bit tidier for the new president.
Would leave ever so ,much more time to apply for
more Nobel Prizes,
more time for
vacations, time on the links , hobnobbing with celebs.
Alas!
George left office with some issues
unresolved and now we
wonder will
that articulate young senator from Chicago that took his
place be on the job tomorrow or will tomorrow be another, ho-hum,
vacation day? (with pay
of course).
Still Waiting!
Still Hoping!
Truth is, and it's equally ironic that so many
professors, educators, czars
and politicians (but not all that
many statesmen)
have partnered with the president
to prescribe (like it or not)
what is best for this country.
This elite group, by virtue of their greater sensitivity
(smile) and their concept of
morality (you can laugh now)
profess to
know exactly what is best for the Republic. It is, so
this elite group of pseudo moralists say, a "moral imperative" to disregard the
will of the governed for
"the greater good".
Oh Joy!
Its kind of like "giving up the radical pose for the
radical ends"
Did I get that right Jonesy?
. Perhaps it may seem a bit
irreverent
to question or challenge either the wisdom or the intent
of so wise a league of gentlemen who are so long and (very) closely associated.
However,
the remark has been made by the president that
Republican. leaders haven't come up with
"'a single solitary new idea" to help the American
people recover from the economic recession.
He went on to say, at a Democratic fundraiser in
Atlanta, that "voters have a choice in the November midterm elections between
what he calls the failed policies of the past (I think he means the very recent
past) or his administration's agenda which Obama says has pulled the country
back from the brink of a depression" (Oh, is that "back from the
brink" phrase
ever so tired? Delete from teleprompter,
New speechwriter please!)
With all due respect to the Office of the President, and without being willfully
contentious with all the czars, felons, terrorists, socialists, communists,
progressives and pseudo moralists that surround the acting president,
there is an somewhat different
school of thought that advances the idea that Democratic
leaders haven't come up with "a single solitary new
idea" in government since the failed policies of Carl
Marx and that voters have a choice in the November midterm election between the
failings socialist
policies of Barrack Obama and a return to constitutional
government, by, for and of the people.
I'm 63.
Except for one semester in college when jobs
were scarce and a six-month period when I was between jobs, but job-hunting
every day, I've worked, hard, since I was 18.
Despite some health challenges, I still put in 50-hour weeks, and haven't called
in sick in seven or eight years. I make a good salary, but I didn't inherit my
job or my income, and I worked to get where I am. Given the economy, there's no
retirement in sight, and and I'm tired. Very tired.
I'm tired of being told that I have to "spread the
wealth" to people who don't have my work ethic. I'm tired of being told the
government will take the money I earned, by force if necessary, and give it to
people too lazy to earn it.
I'm tired of being told that I have to pay more taxes to
"keep people in their homes." Sure, if they lost their jobs or got sick, I'm
willing to help. But if they bought McMansions
at three times the price of our paid-off, $250,000 condo, on one-third of my
salary, then let the left-wing Congress-critters who passed Fannie and Freddie
and the Community Reinvestment Act that created the bubble help them with their
own money.
I'm tired of being told how bad America is by left-wing
millionaires like Michael Moore, George Soros and Hollywood Entertainers who
live in luxury because of the opportunities America offers. In thirty years, if
they get their way, the United States will have the economy of Zimbabwe , the
freedom of the press of China , the crime and violence of Mexico , the tolerance
for Christian people of Iran , and the freedom of speech of Venezuela .
I'm tired of being told that Islam is a "Religion of
Peace," when every day I can read dozens of stories of Muslim men killing their
sisters, wives and daughters for their family "honor"; of Muslims rioting over
some slight offense; of Muslims murdering Christian and Jews because they aren't
"believers"; of Muslims burning schools for girls; of Muslims stoning teenage
rape victims to death for "adultery"; of Muslims mutilating the genitals of
little girls; all in the name of Allah, because the Qur'an and Shari'a law tells
them to.
I'm tired of being told that "race doesn't matter" in the
post-racial world of Obama, when it's all that matters in affirmative action
jobs, lower college admission and graduation standards for minorities (harming
them the most), government contract set-asides, tolerance for the ghetto culture
of violence and fatherless children that hurts minorities more than anyone, and
in the appointment of U.S.
Senators from Illinois.
I think it's very cool that we have a black president and
that a black child is doing her homework at the desk where Lincoln wrote the
Emancipation Proclamation. I just wish the black president was Condi Rice, or
someone who believes more in freedom and the individual and less arrogantly of
an all-knowing government.
I'm tired of being told that out of "tolerance for other
cultures" we must let Saudi Arabia use our oil money to fund mosques and
mandrassa Islamic schools to preach hate in America , while no American group is
allowed to fund a church, synagogue or religious school in Saudi Arabia to teach
love and tolerance.
I'm tired of being told I must lower my living standard
to fight global warming, which no one is allowed to debate. My wife and I live
in a two-bedroom apartment and carpool together five miles to our jobs. We also
own a three-bedroom condo where our daughter and granddaughter live. Our carbon
footprint is about 5% of Al Gore's, and if you're greener than Gore, you're
green enough.
I'm tired of being told that drug addicts have a disease,
and I must help support and treat them, and pay for the damage they do. Did a
giant germ rush out of a dark alley, grab them, and stuff white powder up their
noses while they tried to fight it off? I damn sure think druggies chose to take
drugs. And I'm tired of harassment from cool people treating me like a freak
when I tell them I never tried marijuana.
I'm tired of illegal aliens being called "undocumented
workers," especially the ones who aren't working, but are living on welfare or
crime. What's next? Calling drug dealers, "Undocumented Pharmacists"? And, no,
I'm not against Hispanics. Most of them are Catholic, and it's been a few
hundred years since Catholics wanted to kill me for my religion. I'm willing to
fast track for citizenship any Hispanic person, who can speak English, doesn't
have a criminal record and who is self-supporting without family on welfare, or
who serves honorably for three years in our military.... Those are the citizens
we need.
I'm tired of latte liberals and journalists, who would
never wear the uniform of the Republic themselves, or let their
entitlement-handicapped kids near a recruiting station, trashing our military.
They and their kids can sit at home, never having to make split-second decisions
under life and death circumstances, and bad mouth better people than themselves.
Do bad things happen in war? You bet. Do our
troops sometimes misbehave? Sure. Does this compare with the atrocities that
were the policy of our enemies for the last fifty years and still are?
Not even close. So here's the deal. I'll let
myself be subjected to all the humiliation and abuse that was heaped on
terrorists at Abu Ghraib or Gitmo, and the critics can let themselves be subject
to captivity by the Muslims, who tortured and beheaded Daniel Pearl in Pakistan,
or the Muslims who tortured and murdered Marine Lt. Col. William Higgins in
Lebanon, or the Muslims who ran the blood-spattered Al Qaeda torture rooms our
troops found in Iraq, or the Muslims who cut off the heads of schoolgirls in
Indonesia, because the girls were Christian. Then we'll compare notes. British
and American soldiers are the only troops in history that civilians came to for
help and handouts, instead of hiding from in fear.
I'm tired of people telling me that their party has a corner on virtue and the other party has a
corner on corruption. Read the papers; bums are bipartisan. And I'm tired of
people telling me we need bipartisanship. I live in Illinois , where
the "Illinois Combine" of Democrats has worked to loot the public for years. Not
to mention the tax cheats in Obama's cabinet.
I'm tired of hearing wealthy athletes, entertainers and
politicians of both parties talking about innocent mistakes, stupid mistakes or
youthful mistakes, when we all know they think their only mistake was getting
caught. I'm tired of people with a sense of entitlement, rich or poor.
Speaking of poor, I'm tired of hearing people with
air-conditioned homes, color TVs and two cars called poor. The majority of
Americans didn't have that in 1970, but we didn't know we were "poor." The
poverty pimps have to keep changing the definition of poor to keep the dollars
flowing.
I'm real tired of people who don't take responsibility
for their lives and actions. I'm tired of hearing them blame the government, or
discrimination or big-whatever for their problems.
Yes, I'm damn tired. But I'm also glad to be 63. Because,
mostly, I'm not going to have to see the world these people are making. I'm just
sorry for my granddaughter.
Robert A. Hall is a
Marine Vietnam veteran who served five terms in the Massachusetts
State Senate.
If the Constitution is a "living breathing
document", as the modern, so-called liberals would have us believe, it has also
been crying from the abuse to its broken heart by the Big Fed three headed
monster (Administrative, Congressional, and Judicial).
The Instrument by which the wise Founders implemented the wonderful, Natural,
notion that government served at the will and consent of the governed has been
turned upside down. That which clearly defined the powers granted to the federal
government and protected the governed from tyrannical abuses has been
interpreted (by Big Fed itself) to now impose restrictions on the citizenry and
allow seemingly unlimited powers to The Monster. Just the opposite of their
clear intent for the Constitution they so carefully crafted.
Through the perversion of two clauses in the constitution, the "Commerce
Clause", meant to facilitate commerce between two, or more, states, and another
clause, (intentionally misnamed the "Elastic Clause" for political reasons)
meant to restrict Congress from passing unnecessary legislation, or laws not
Constitutionally proper, the Monster has passed unwanted legislation to force
citizens to buy a service from other citizens. It has "borrowed" money from a
generation of Americans not yet in high school to spend foolishly to bailout
failing businesses (thereby punishing the businesses who functioned properly)
and waste billions of dollars that have not created the jobs the Monster
promised.
This out of control Monster has failed to do its duty to protect our borders yet
overstepped its duty by taking over our children's schools and our nation's
health care. They are considering an array of innovative taxes to further
separate us from our money and property, and are seeking methods to deny our
right to openly criticize the Monster on radio and the Internet. The Monster
wants to tell us what we can eat and what temperature is appropriate in our
homes. In fact, I cannot mentalize what area of our lives the government does
not want to control.
I believe we are at the crossroads of the last chance to pass on to our
posterity any semblance of liberty and a government truly run by the citizenry.
While this next round of elections is crucial, I believe the real work is just
starting as I have no real confidence that anybody we elect to the federal level
will long serve as our protector from the Monster...whenever we cut off one of
its heads the Monster soon grows it back. My thinking is that we only slay this
Monster at the state, county, and local levels. And as individuals we must work
at those levels, and refuse to obey unconstitutional legislation. We the people,
not the federal government, should be the interpreters of the Constitution.
After all, the Constitution was initiated to keep the federal government in
check.....does it make any sense to let the subject being held in check to
interpret whether or not it is operating properly and its actions are necessary.
I strongly, urge all citizens to vote in all elections at every level. If your
own state doesn't allow citizen initiative on its ballot elect legislators who
will vote it in. Learn all you can about the process of Nullification. A great
place to start is at the Tenth Amendment Center web site. This is OUR fight now.
It is not enough to beg our representatives to "please don't overstep your
delegated authority", WE can't just sit here and hope our judges will rule in a
strict Constitutional fashion.
It IS up to us....and its our last chance.
Yours in Liberty,
Laurence
Something to Reflect On----The Reflecting Pool
The IRS in Andover Mass. will soon have their very own
reflecting pool, thanks to the American taxpayer and the generosity of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. What a lovely idea! Just Imagine.
Your overpaid Internal Service Agent can lounge in the splendor of a reflecting
pool while reflecting on ways and means to take more of your money. Marvelous.
Other amenities include an art gallery, naturally, an amphitheater (oh joy!), a
7,000 square-foot cafeteria (why not?) and, of course, indoor gardens. It was
not formally announced, but, most likely, the refurbished facility will have
running water and indoor bathrooms. The "green upgrades" to the 400,000 square
foot facility will cost taxpayers an estimated $92,000,000.00
(Yes, $92 million). The project is said to be "visionary". (But of course it is!
we can see visions of $92 mil flying away).
Jonathon Levi, architect of the renovation, said, "It will be a comfortable,
collaborative environment". Levi went on to say, "It will be welcoming for the
people who use it" and it would foster "community and belonging". Isn't that the
sweetest thing you ever heard?
1 Tea-edTexan
May 01, 2010
Report from Cochise County, Arizona
By T.J. Woodard
Being an avid AT reader, and living on the Arizona border in Cochise County, I
thought I would provide those who wish to be informed some insight into the
truth about the state of the U.S.-Mexican border -- at least in this part of the
state.
I moved to Cochise County after retiring from the Army in 2008 to take a
position working at Fort Huachuca (pronounced "wa-choo-ka," an Apache word
meaning "place of thunder" and referring to the time after the summer monsoon
season). Having lived here in 1991 for eight months while attending an Army
school, I soon realized that the place had changed considerably in the eighteen
years of my absence.
The first thing I noticed was how many border patrol vehicles were on the roads
in the city of Sierra Vista. The Border Patrol has a large station near here in
the city of Naco. There are far more Border Patrol vehicles in the area than SV
police cars. They come in many forms -- trucks for off-road work, trailers
carrying all-terrain vehicles, pickups with capacity for carrying large numbers
of people once apprehended, and even a staff car for the area chaplain. The
Border Patrol presence has grown substantially, so one would think the border
area was nice and safe.
Not so.
Within a short time after arriving in southern Arizona while on my way to work,
I noticed eight illegal immigrants on the side of the road. Fortunately, they
were in the custody of capable and attentive Border Patrol agents.
Unfortunately, they were less than a hundred feet from my daughter's bus stop.
She gets personal service to school now, as the school district refuses to enter
the gated community in which we live.
There is a nice wash, a valley into which the rainwater drains during the
monsoons, which provides a nice route for the illegals to follow into the city,
and therefore into their locations for pickup by the vehicles that will get them
farther north.
Later, after I attended a movie on a Friday night, a car passed by me in the
next lane going nearly a hundred miles an hour. It took a few seconds before I
saw the police behind -- way behind -- with lights and sirens, trying to catch
up. Surprise, surprise -- the next morning's paper discussed a Mexican drug
runner being caught by County Sheriff's Deputies. On several occasions, the
Border Patrol's helicopter has flown low and slow over the neighborhood,
rattling windows and shining its spotlight in our backyard. When this happens, I
strap on my pistol, grab a flashlight, and look and listen. Fortunately, I
haven't found anybody within a hundred yards of the house -- yet.
Working on a U.S. Army fort, one would think we were fairly secure from these
threats. Just not true. Reading the Fort Huachuca newspaper one morning, I
noticed an interesting part of the "community" page. It asked for volunteers to
assist in cleaning up "dumps" on posts where the illegals would drop their
supplies used to cross the border and change clothing. They do this in order to
blend in and not look like they just spent a day or two crossing the border in
the dust and heat of southern Arizona. The most frightening part of this is that
Fort Huachuca is the U.S. Army Intelligence Center, where the Army trains its
intelligence soldiers -- analysts, interrogators, radio intercept specialists,
and counterintelligence agents -- for operations overseas. If we can't secure
the fort we use to train our intelligence soldiers, how can we secure anything
else?
Much has been discussed about the new law in Arizona making it unlawful to be in
Arizona in violation of federal immigration statutes. However, much less has
been discussed about the shooting of rancher Robert Krentz. Robert was killed on
his ranch on March 28, 2010. His ranch, on which the family began grazing cattle
in 1907 (Arizona became a state in 1912), is a large, 35,000-acre area in remote
Cochise County. It is so remote that the original Cochise, an Apache leader,
used the mountainous terrain near it to hide from the U.S. Cavalry in the early
1870s. But much less is being said about the eight illegal immigrants and their
load of 280 pounds of marijuana seized the day before Krentz was killed.
So Arizona should be boycotted because its people would like to keep it safe?
Somebody please explain the logic of that for me. It doesn't take a bullet from
a drug runner's gun to make those of us down here near the border understand
that this is drug-related violence -- and Rob's death proves it.
It also doesn't take much more reading to see that the drug dealers are a huge
problem with far-reaching capabilities. On April 27, 2010, a large drug bust
took place here in Cochise County. Among those arrested was Angelica Marie
Borquez, the secretary for the Drug Enforcement Division of the Cochise County
Attorney office. Allegedly, Ms. Borquez was tipping off the drug runners to
counter drug operations conducted by the county. She was so bold that she used
the phone in the County Attorney's office to make some of her calls.
This isn't a blatant effort by drug cartels to obtain control here in America?
Many have already called Arizona residents racists. They are concerned that
police will profile Hispanics and disproportionally harass them. But we
understand something others in Washington, D.C. and San Francisco don't seem to
remember -- we border Mexico. The fact is that most illegal immigrants coming
across the border here are, WELL, Mexicans. Those of us down here facing the
danger every day really don't care what some Hollywood actor has to say about
the issue. Nor do we care about what the Colombian government or the Latino
music community thinks of it. We just want to stay safe.
This is not about race; it's about facts. Use a few of these facts the next time
somebody wants to engage you in discussion about the border. Tell him you
learned these things from somebody who can see Mexico from his front porch.
T.J. Woodard is a retired Army officer who lives less than ten miles from the
Mexican border. He carries a pistol even in his own house (my underline) in
order to be prepared to defend his family whenever necessary
"Pants on the ground, pants on the ground, looking like a
fool with you pants on the ground,,,,,", catchy and amusing lyrics by General
Larry Platt, befitting the most recent scandal of the Obama
administration, the Joe Sestak bribery attempt.
The plot
thickened and new dimensions were added to the White House improprieties when
former President William Jefferson (I did not have sex with that woman) "Bill"
Echoing the
repeated statement "nothing inappropriate happened" by White House press
secretary Robert Gibbs, in a recent news conference, President Obama stated that
"nothing improper took place". Despite the less than reassuring remarks by
Gibbs and Obama,
This allegation of the attempted bribe, which occurred in the
previous June and July, first came to light in February when Sestek told a
local television show host, Larry Kane, that the White House had offered
him a "high level job in the Obama administration" if he would drop out of the
race against turncoat Arlen Specter (D. Pa). Public disclosure of
Sestak's allegations sent the White House into a "cover your ass" mode.
First came the standard denial followed by a period of comparative silence on
the matter. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs continued to dance
around the issue deflecting questions with his standard "no comment" reply, or
"I have nothing to add". On the other hand, Sestak, refusing to elaborate
on his story, danced around the opposite end of the issue as he continued to
reaffirm his allegations and repeatedly said that he "wasn't lying" . It
is becoming more certain that there was "a whole lot of "dirty dancing" going
on. AND THE DIRTY DANCE CONTINUES!
But now the
status quo in
On the other hand, Sestak, now a serious contender for a
Senatorial seat, suddenly found favor with the White House and party officials,
and must come to their defense. The bribery allegations he made, seemingly
so important during his primary campaign, he must now minimize and dismiss as
unimportant. Failure to do so could result in severe sanctions by his own
party. AHOY ADMIRAL! TIME FOR YOU TO COME ON DECK AND MAN-UP!
THIS IS YOUR WATCH! TIME FOR YOU TO DO THE RIGHT THING!
With no disrespect to Rep. Sestak or his service to this
country, I reprint exerps from the website militarycorruption.com:
"It took the new Chief of Naval
Operations, Admiral Mike Mullens, less than 24 hours to dump one of the most
disliked officers among the Navy's top brass. Vice-Admiral Joe Sestak, an
arrogant and obnoxious "bully-boy", who delighted in being rude and unreasonable
and getting away with it, found he was expendable the minute his mentor went out
the door."
"It was
Sestak, a Harvard graduate served under former President
Clinton as Director of Defense Policy on the National Security Council and
Director of "Deep Blue", providing advice to the Chief of Naval Operations.
Because of
Sestak's long association with the former president,
HOWEVER,
Remember now that
the original allegation was, they offered me(Sestak) a high level JOB in the
Obama administration. More recently,
One pressing question which both Clinton and Sestak have
failed to answer is "Which high level job" and/or which "non-paying
POSITION on which board" was offered. Clearly, suspicion of wrongdoings
and outright mistrust of the Obama administration will not go away until these
questions are addressed.
The White House
must also explain why a non-government associate,
A complete and thorough investigation by honest and impartial
investigators is urgently called for.
Let no guilty party go unpunished and
let no one who tries or conspires to "fix" or "rig" an election ever succeed.
1Tea-edTexan
OH MY GOSH!
That IS Fundamental Transformation
This is a continuation of my previous submission relating to
the Arizona Immigration Law.
OHMYGOSH!
OHMYGOSH!
The words
kept going through my mind.
This is exactly what is happening to our country.
As the last of the flavorful beverage flowed into the drain
and vanished,
the gurgling sound grew
quiet until all that remained was the empty container. The only evidence
of what was once pure and
beautiful, sweet and vibrant, was an empty and lifeless bottle.
OHMYGOSH!
This IS
Fundamental Transformation.
I could
never think of an analogy so bold or so strikingly accurate as the
comparison of
"pouring of
the wine and it's passage down the drain"
to the concept of fundamental transformation.
Since childhood, I can remember hearing the expressions,
"going down the drain" and "going down the tube".
Both phrases have been tossed about so casually and carelessly that "I"
never gave much
thought to their
true or deeper meaning.
How could
"I" ever have been so inattentive?
How could "I" ever have been so dense?
Today, the dreadful meaning of both expressions has become frightfully
clear. " OHMYGOSH!
This is a
horribly ugly but objective representation of
fundamental transformation" .
We
can throw
"to Hell in a hand basket" into the mix, as well.
They all mean the same.
They
are all like different drains feeding into a common sewer line that leads to a
colorless, tasteless and spiritless altered state.
After awhile, my thoughts returned to
Arizona's immigration dilemma, now compounded by remarks from
the White House,
the Justice
Department and by officials of other cities.
I began to think, there must be something more that I can do.
Heck yes, it occurred to me,
there
is!
I take a vacation every year.
This year I will not go to San Francisco.
Honestly, I had no intentions
of going there in the first place but now SAN FRANCISCO IS ON MY NO FLY
LIST.
Won't be going to Knottsberry
Farm or Los Angeles either...Hollywood is definitely out and I will not spend a
dime in any sanctuary city in any state.
Matter of fact, the whole darn state of California will be on my no fly
list.
Add
this on top of my one man boycott of California wine.
Now I am getting someplace, I thought, but
there was more to follow.
I planned
to extend my wine
boycott to include anything and everything
raised, canned, brewed,
bottled, manufactured or imported in, by or through California, including fruit
and produce, textiles and you name it...CDs, DVDs, electronics, etcetera,
etc...... If it has California on the label, it's on my list.
I
also intend to boycott all
movies.
On the other
hand,
Arizona has
so much more to offer than just the Grand Canyon.
I have no illusions about how much difference I can or cannot
make.
I only know that whatever
difference I can make, I will make.
I'm small potatoes and I know it.
But
I will not spend my dollars where any
portion of those dollars
might go
to support a state government that spends excessively and
foolishly and
subsidizes
illegal immigration
and encourages
more of the same.
President Truman said, "the buck stops here".
My version of that is "THE BUCK STARTS HERE".
That's right,
The buck
starts right here and
"I" will
exercise monetary control.
"I" will decide how, where and when I spend my dollars.
I'm small potatoes all right but my home is a very large potato bin and I
am kin to millions of small potatoes.
Some may have the resolve to start their own one person boycott, others
will not.
But if we don't, WHO THE
HELL WILL?
We do not need a leader.
We do not need organization.
We do not need
structure.
We do not need to join anything, sign anything, buy anything, pledge
anything, contribute anything or say anything.
We do not need to take to the streets, march in protest, carry signs or
resort to violence.
We need only to
resolve to withdraw and with-hold any and all support from persons, celebrities,
businesses,
industries, politicians and
legislators and governments that lobby or labor for any cause or measure not
consistent with the Constitution, and to remain true to our resolve.
I look forward, eagerly, to November, when I
cast my vote to oust those who so poorly serve so
great a country.
I will end this article by saying that all who reads these words should be empowered by the knowledge that "THE BUCK STARTS HERE" and collectively, we can make a difference
1Tea-edTexan
Oh My Gosh! That's Exactly What's Happening to Our Country
The comments about to be made relate to issues concerning the
newly enacted Arizona Immigration Law and your article appearing on
Freedom Trail.
My comments, I fear, will be far too lengthy to post on RFA, so I send
them directly to you in the form of an attachment.
Before proceeding, on behalf of many, I (We) thank you for
providing this website and for a forum where
the least of the least and the smallest of the small can exercise their
freedom of speech and their voices can be heard, not just by those
within ear-shot, but across this country and beyond.
Thank you Richard!
Thank you
Deanie!
Illegal immigration is not a new concern in the Lone Star
State.
Texans have talked about it,
lived with it and dealt with it for decades.
Early on, for the most part, illegals tried to stay inconspicuous and to
blend-in with the population
as
much as possible.
Few ever became
troublemakers and even fewer were criminals.
Most were honest and hardworking, God fearing, family oriented
and
self supporting.
Most went about their business almost un-noticed.
Perhaps some would draw attention when causing a delay in
a check-out line because they did not speak our language or understand
our currency.
A minor inconvenience
at the most and not worthy of making a fuss or any
legislative action.
There
were no drug cartels and what ever gang violence that existed was mostly in the
big cities of the northeast and that was people of
other races.
Texans
were complacent about illegal immigration , as were most other Americans.
After all, there were already federal laws on the books and there were
agencies who were supposed to deal with immigration.
Sooner or later, we thought, the government would get around to enforcing
immigration
laws and besides,
that's not our job.
(Heard
something else like that recently, like: "that's above my pay grade")
anyway,
we were all too
busy.
We were all so busy
making a living, raising kids and preparing for the future that we could
not see what was just down the road.
Because change occurs slowly over time, none can say precisely when
change occurs, only that change has happened.
Because of that, change is more often than not, described in terms of
time periods or eras.
We can look
back over time and discern that change has occurred, but, change, like a cancer,
occurs almost unnoticed until it demands our full attention.
And then it happened.....CHANGE CAME......American jobs were
exported abroad
with no
corresponding importation of jobs.
Jobs that Americans once held
were
now being filled with immigrants both legal and illegal..
At the same
time, there was
a growing dependency on state and federal welfare subsidies from which many
would never escape.
Illegal
immigration skyrocketed as millions of desperate Mexicans migrated north.
Trafficking in humans, with it's inherent dangers, took root.
Violence erupted along the border as the drug cartels fought for
territorial control.
More violence,
including kidnapping and murder spilled over into peaceful towns north of the
border.
This was the face of
change, pal, THIS WAS REAL CHANGE.
While the job market and the
economic landscape was "evolving",
long
respected social norms were cast aside in favor of more Progressive and Liberal
concepts.
Facts are, and statistics
will bear this out, that progressive and liberal
thought has eroded our trust in government, reduced our sense of national
purpose, lowered our standing in the global community and perverted national
morality. We have become more focused on the NFL, AFL, NBL, NBA, batting stats,
soap operas, happy hour
and late
night comedians than we are on the direction and future of our country.
More recently we have become less of a nation of laws, to become more of
a nation of rock stars.
And
the more that the government picks and chooses which laws to enforce (or not
enforce) OR who will or will not be prosecuted, the less of a nation of laws we
become.
And all this for the
greater good and the betterment of society?
GIVE US A BREAK!
Let no one construe or misconstrue my remarks as being
anti-government.
I believe,,,, no,
I know, that we have the best system of government that man has ever devised and
that it is well founded in our Constitution.
At the same time, I believe that our country and our Constitution is
poorly served by corrupt politicians who wish to alter or circumvent the
fundamental laws of our land
and
the structure of our Republic.
In regards to the Arizona Immigration Law, I was a bit more
than pleased to hear of it's passage.
I salute the Arizona State Legislature and Governor Jan Brewer for their
courage and their devotion to their state and to their duty in taking this bold
action.
I thought, wishfully, that
Arizona would set a new standard for other states to follow or, at very least,
it would cause so much embarrassment to
the federal government
that
government
officials
would make at least a face-saving attempt at securing our borders and
dealing with illegals in an effective way.
Such has not been the case.
Before the weekend was over, agitated protestors took
to the streets in major cities shouting out demands on our government and
condemning all who oppose them as raciest and hate mongers.
Not surprisingly they were joined by public officials, members of the
clergy and mass media who echoed their demands and jeers.
I was a little annoyed by the tenor of the protesters and by
the nature of their demands, but they were not burning cars, looting
or bursting windows, so I was cool with the demonstrations.
As news of the day came
in,
San Francisco City Attorney Darrell Steinberg called for his city to
terminate all business
(economic
ties) with Arizona
Excuse me,
EXCUSE ME!
I equate that action to
cutting
diplomatic relations
with a foreign government.
That was
plenty bad enough but it did not end there.
Steinberg went on to send a letter to the governor urging him to cancel
contracts with Arizona.
Still it
did not end.
A call was made to
discourage Californians from visiting Arizona and others called for cancelling
some sporting events.
EXCUSE
ME!
What the Hell business does the
San Francisco City Attorney
or anyone else have to meddle in the business of a neighboring state.
Maybe it's because they have
screwed up their city and their state so badly and misery loves company .
Darn right, I got way past annoyed
with all that crap and I wanted to do something about it.
But I don't live in either state, I cannot vote in their elections, so
what's left for me to do?
I can say that
I
support Arizona and their right to defend their citizens.
That's
easy enough but it
isn't enough.
I want to, I
feel compelled to do something more.
Emails and conversations with others verified that many other
non-residents of Arizona are sympathetic for Arizonians and want to help
in a meaningful way.
This issue has
occupied much of my thought for several days now but still
I did not know what I could
do.............until today.
About mid morning, I made a foray on my pantry in search of
some canned vegetables and THERE IT WAS!
Right up front,
in plain
sight, smack-dab between a row of
black-eyed peas and a row of
tomato
puree, stood one tall and beautiful bottle of Ernest & Julio Gallo's White
Zinfandel , straight from the Ernest & Julio Gallo California Vineyards.
WOW!.
I recall now that we
purchased this bottle along with several others back around last Christmas.
This one had not been
opened
and was put away in the pantry and forgotten.
This was definitely not a fancy wine, it was not a French or Italian
wine, just a fairly common and inexpensive
table wine but to me it would be special.
It was a California wine and it would become my sacrificial wine....and
no, I was not going to get smashed.
I knew instantly what I would do with the White Zin.
I knew that I would pour it down the drain and before I reached the
kitchen sink area I had made a resolution to never buy another wine from
California.
I would do this thing
without witness or fanfare and few would ever know.
The pouring of the wine would be a private and spirit(ual) sacrifice to
signify my commitment to my resolution.
And with that
that I would begin a one man protest, a
one man boycott of California wines.
OK,....so neither
Ernest &
Julio Gallo nor the California wine industry will ever know of my puny efforts,
but I will know.
And they may never
feel the punishing blow of my epic economic sanctions
but at
least I would have done
something and I would know it.
Finally the cork was removed.
I took one final sniff, drawing the fruity aroma into my nose and
recalling that
this wine had been
served at many family gatherings.
Then, tipping the bottle,
I began a
slow and thoughtful pour.
The rich
pink liquid swirled around in the sink-basket, emitting a gurgling noise
as it disappeared into the darkness of the pipe below.
As the bottle began to empty, I closed my eyes to visualize the path to
be taken by this sacrificial fluid.
In my minds eye, I could see it passing from the sink basket, into the dark
opening, down to the P-trap empting into a pipe going through the slab and into
the drain line, flowing out to the sewer line where it combined with slime and
sludge and human waste of many other drains and pumped to a far away place where
it combined with billions of other particles and was processed and filtered and
things added and things removed
until finally it re-emerged as a clear, colorless
and tasteless liquid with no resemblance to it's earlier form.
The color has been removed, the taste has disappeared
and the effervescence is no more.
Capable of sustaining life, Yes,
but that is all.
OHMYGOSH!
That is exactly what's happening to our country.
Letter from retired border agents& Citizens:
BeasleyStoddard
Az. Experience